• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

UGreen Max5c: $25 NC Headphone Review

Rate this noise cancelling headphone:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 7 5.4%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 17 13.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 68 52.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 38 29.2%

  • Total voters
    130

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
45,911
Likes
256,321
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, detailed measurements, listening tests and EQ of the Ugreen HiTune Max5c noise cancelling wireless headphone. It is on kind loan from a member and is on sale for $25.47 (retail $57).
UGREEN HiTune Max5c Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Cheap Headphone Review.jpg

The Max5c feels every bit as high quality as much, much more expensive wireless headphones. The cups while a bit small for my ears, are comfortable and have a plush feel. It supports USB-C for both charging and acting as a "sound card" to the operating system. An app is provided for control/EQ but sadly, not from the official store. It is a side-load that you install on Android which I dislike. EDIT: there is an approve iOS app.

Further, as shipped, it defaults to "Bass" enhancement so using the EQ is a must. The app is straightforward but sadly doesn't work when you plug in the USB-C cable, forcing me to use Bluetooth for testing.

I did not test the microphone but in the one and only video review of it, the quality was impressively good! I subjectively tested the noise cancelling feature and it seemed effective although not as good as higher end headphones (this is from memory).

Voice feedback for setting changes is done nicely and controls are easy to learn and use.

I turned on "High-res" mode but no matter what I did with my Samsung phone, it would insist on using AAC instead of LDAC. Maybe there is a way to make it work but I ran out of patience to get there.

Ugreen HiTune Max5c Measurements
I selected "Classic" for EQ profile as there is no "off" setting. This the frequency response:
UGREEN HiTune Max5c Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Cheap Headphone Frequency Response Measurement.png


There is some deep bass roll off. Not sure the reason for that.

We see ringing in bass frequencies going up to midrange. Compliance after that is decent. In relative terms, we are looking at this deviation:
UGREEN HiTune Max5c Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Cheap Headphone target Frequency Response Measu...png


The shape of the deviations lends itself to PEQ correction which is nice.

Not happy about the distortion in lower treble:
UGREEN HiTune Max5c Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Cheap Headphone THD Distortion Response Measure...png


UGREEN HiTune Max5c Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Cheap Headphone THD Distortion relative Measure...png

No impedance or sensitivity measurements as this is an "active" headphone.

Ugreen HiTune Max5c Headphone Listening Tests
I was pleasantly surprised that out of box sound was pleasant. Those peaks in bass magnified low frequency notes at times which was not annoying and some people may like. Indeed, if I did not have EQ ability, I would have thought this was very good fidelity. But we do have EQ and this is what I came up with:
UGREEN HiTune Max5c Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Cheap Headphone EQ.png

With these filters, the bass tightened up and spatial qualities/details improved. Track after track in my library sounded excellent.

The only miss was sub-bass where the presence was subdued with a bit of distortion. Mind you, it delivers more sub-bass than anything other than large tower speakers.

Conclusions
If you didn't tell me otherwise, or force me to side-load an app into my phone, I would have said this is a $300 headphone, not a $25 one from a company that normally makes USB cables and such! As long as you can defeat the default bass EQ, the sound is more than good enough without EQ. With EQ, it wears the "high fidelity" label with pride and almost delivers there. Noise cancelling works good enough with the microphone delivering fidelity that is hard to believe.

I wish the company would finish the job by defaulting to EQ off and getting an approved App for both Android and iPhone. It would be a killer than at this price.

As is, I am still going to recommend the Ugreen HiTune Max5c assuming you are comfortable side loading an app into your android phone.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

  • UGREEN HiTune Max5c Frequency Response.zip
    34.1 KB · Views: 92
Last edited:
Reserved for @AdamG to kindly post the specs.

Manufacturer Specifications: (Could not find a reliable source, taken from a third party)

IMG_0930.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's impressive for $25, still good at full price. :oops:

I have a few UGreen bits and bobs, USB cables, chargers and the like and so far they've all been good.

I also have a little USB headphone adapter, which cost around £12.00, I think. I haven't really tried to compare it seriously to my desktop amp, but it sounds fine to me.

1731967320664.png
 
I wish the company would finish the job by defaulting to EQ off and getting an approved App for both Android and iPhone. It would be a killer than at this price.
For $26 bucks. That’s a lot of positivity. Stocking stuffers may perhaps…Thanks for the review Boss.
 
UPDATE FOR FRONT PAGE: THERE IS AN OFFICIAL APPLE IPHONE APP FOR THIS. IT IS CALLED "UGREEN HOME."

Thank you Amir for reviewing these and for doing so before Black Friday. I understand how busy you are and I appreciate you getting your review up at this time.

I had a hunch that they would measure well enough to be worth consideration by anyone looking at premium wireless headphones at this time of year. They certainly forced me to think very hard about the value I would get from the big players in the market.

I really like these for 5 reasons.

1. They genuinely sound good in classic mode. More importantly, nothing sounds off. I have a lot of experience with Harman tuning now and thought that, while not perfect, I was able to live with any (minor) shortcomings that I was hearing a) because of the price and b) because there are always waaaay more compromises with over-the-ear headphones than with earbuds. Glad to say that ASR has helped me recognize correct sound!

2. The price is crazy good for what you get. The build quality and the way that it feels like polished product (except for the app of course) are what put these in the golfing panther tier for me. I'm sorry but they highlight just how cheap most JBL and AKG headphones look and feel even at 8 times the price. Don't expect miracles with the ANC, however, but how can one complain at the price!

3. LDAC. *I* simply won't consider a Bluetooth headphone without it in 2024. You do need to set it up via app, however. I myself have had a good experience with the app. It certainly irks me to have to side-load it, and too many companies seem comfortable with this approach (e.g. Moondrop). Who knows if there are any privacy compromises.

4. For me as I use them they go nearly a month without a charge!

5. I have not had connection issues and they are easy to set-up (provided you are OK with the app) and control. A female voice tell you when they are turned on and off and when the settings change. It is well done and overall the headphones exude quality and give confidence.

The frequency response looks similar to what I was imagining in my head EXCEPT that I thought there was a small boost between 2-3kHz. Could it be the resonances/distortion? I'll experiment with the volume to better emphasize the limits of that area but I can say that I did not have a problem with it prior to sending them in.
 
Last edited:
Cool review! Have you considered doing simple noise cancellation tests by putting the headphones on the fixture with ANC on, and playing pink noise over speakers, or something similar?

ANC is one of the more important features of a headphone like this, and while they all claim some deicbel level or another of cancellation, it's hard to trust 1st party numbers in a situation like this.
 
Cool review! Have you considered doing simple noise cancellation tests by putting the headphones on the fixture with ANC on, and playing pink noise over speakers, or something similar?
It is a backburner project to build such a fixture. Currently I don't have one and don't want to produce ad-hoc measurements.
 
@kemmler3D Amir's GRAS 45CA version I believe is not rated for measuring ear protection (insufficient self-insertion loss), so an entirely different HATS may be required (GRAS 45CB, ideally).

It gets even more complicated when setting up the sound source. A single speaker playing constant pink noise won't get you far.

Ideally, a surround sound setup playing realistic ambient noise would be used.

rtings and Head Acoustics have created such a setup, see below:
https://youtu.be/-zE1CsM-XLE?t=416
https://youtu.be/VtCcBRovYw4?t=157
 
Last edited:
I often wonder if these ANC headphones default to a bass boost because when used in a noisy environment (airplane, train, bus) rather than a quiet environment the background noise drown out normal bass.
I take their bass boost exactly with the practical intention, but from a designers perspective I just assume that the masses' appeal is just moar bass moar better. We already have the Harman statistical model to tell us otherwise but that doesn't stop being a trend with these companies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
Thanks for this review, Amir. Looking at it, seems like a lot of value, but obviously going to be missing sub bass, no matter what. I think I would rather have put in a high shelf at 3k of +2db, and, since I'm kind of a bass head, just added a peak filter at 150 hz to bring up that trough so it was level with what comes before and after. The only problem is the mid range distortion and resonance, but it's still about 40 db down from the signal, so it's about 1 percent there, really not that bad IMHO. So. really. if you can eq it, and given the other stuff like a mic and noise cancelling, it seems like just a stupid bargain at $20.

Easy to see why you recommended it.
 
Last edited:
@amirm Just noticed this thread was posted under headphone amplifier reviews and discussion not the headphone review and discussion section.
 
Last edited:
The look and the cups remind me a lot of the Plantronics backbeat pro 2 wireless noise canceling headphones, an imperfect but very nice one, with very similar specs...

1000002607.png
 
UGreen appears to be one of the better OEM for reasonably priced “stuff”.
As such they went through an FCC certification and the report is here:

From the internal pictures, it looks to be built around a Zhuhai Jieli chip:
IMG_2146.jpeg


I couldn’t read the exact reference, but if it is from the JL701xx series—see attached datasheet—the DAC/Amp has decent specs.
 

Attachments

  • JL7016G-Datasheet-V1.6.pdf
    964.6 KB · Views: 75
This is a review, detailed measurements, listening tests and EQ of the Ugreen HiTune Max5c noise cancelling wireless headphone. It is on kind loan from a member and is on sale for $25.47 (retail $57).
View attachment 407795
The Max5c feels every bit as high quality as much, much more expensive wireless headphones. The cups while a bit small for my ears, are comfortable and have a plush feel. It supports USB-C for both charging and acting as a "sound card" to the operating system. An app is provided for control/EQ but sadly, not from the official store. It is a side-load that you install on Android which I dislike. Further, as shipped, it defaults to "Bass" enhancement so using the EQ is a must. The app is straightforward but sadly doesn't work when you plug in the USB-C cable, forcing me to use Bluetooth for testing.

I did not test the microphone but in the one and only video review of it, the quality was impressively good! I subjectively tested the noise cancelling feature and it seemed effective although not as good as higher end headphones (this is from memory).

Voice feedback for setting changes is done nicely and controls are easy to learn and use.

I turned on "High-res" mode but no matter what I did with my Samsung phone, it would insist on using AAC instead of LDAC. Maybe there is a way to make it work but I ran out of patience to get there.

Ugreen HiTune Max5c Measurements
I selected "Classic" for EQ profile as there is no "off" setting. This the frequency response:
View attachment 407803

There is some deep bass roll off. Not sure the reason for that.

We see ringing in bass frequencies going up to midrange. Compliance after that is decent. In relative terms, we are looking at this deviation:
View attachment 407804

The shape of the deviations lends itself to PEQ correction which is nice.

Not happy about the distortion in lower treble:
View attachment 407807

View attachment 407808
No impedance or sensitivity measurements as this is an "active" headphone.

Ugreen HiTune Max5c Headphone Listening Tests
I was pleasantly surprised that out of box sound was pleasant. Those peaks in bass magnified low frequency notes at times which was not annoying and some people may like. Indeed, if I did not have EQ ability, I would have thought this was very good fidelity. But we do have EQ and this is what I came up with:
View attachment 407812
With these filters, the bass tightened up and spatial qualities/details improved. Track after track in my library sounded excellent.

The only miss was sub-bass where the presence was subdued with a bit of distortion. Mind you, it delivers more sub-bass than anything other than large tower speakers.

Conclusions
If you didn't tell me otherwise, or force me to side-load an app into my phone, I would have said this is a $300 headphone, not a $25 one from a company that normally makes USB cables and such! As long as you can defeat the default bass EQ, the sound is more than good enough without EQ. With EQ, it wears the "high fidelity" label with pride and almost delivers there. Noise cancelling works good enough with the microphone delivering fidelity that is hard to believe.

I wish the company would finish the job by defaulting to EQ off and getting an approved App for both Android and iPhone. It would be a killer than at this price.

As is, I am still going to recommend the Ugreen HiTune Max5c assuming you are comfortable side loading an app into your android phone.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/

@amirm the last PEQ does have a Q factor, I used 1.
If it is not then the score for your EQ is inaccurate.

Usually, BT SOCs provide plenty of EQ capabilities including Dynamic range compressors, therefore the tuning should represent the intent of the designers.

Here are some thoughts about the EQ.
Please report your findings, positive or negative!

Notes about the EQ design:
  • The average L/R is used to calculate the score.
  • The resolution is 12 points per octave interpolated from the raw data (provided by @amirm)
  • A Genetic Algorithm is used to optimize the EQ.
  • The EQ Score is designed to MAXIMIZE the Score WHILE fitting the Harman target curve (and other constrains) with a fixed complexity.
    This will avoid weird results if one only optimizes for the Score, start your journey here or there.
    There is a presentation by S. Olive here.
    It will probably flatten the Error regression doing so, the tonal balance should be therefore more neutral.
  • The EQs are starting point and may require tuning (certainly at LF and maybe at HF).
  • The range around and above 10kHz is usually not EQed unless smooth enough to do so.
  • I am using PEQ (PK) as from my experience the definition is more consistent across different DSP/platform implementations than shelves.
  • With some HP/amp combo, the boosts and preamp gain (loss of Dynamic range) need to be carefully considered to avoid issues with, amongst other things, too low a Max SPL or damaging your device. You have beed warned.
  • Not all units of the same product are made equal. The EQ is based on the measurements of a single unit. YMMV with regard to the very unit you are trying this EQ on.
  • I sometimes use variations of the Harman curve for some reasons. See rational here and here
  • NOTE: the score then calculated is not comparable to the scores derived from the default Harman target curve if not otherwise noted

OK L/R match.

I have generated two EQs, the APO config files are attached.
For the price it could be a nice way to experiment with EQ etc.

Score no EQ: 66.6
Score Amirm: 89.1 (great effort)
Score with EQ: 99.1


UGREEN HiTune Max5c APO EQ Flat@HF 96000Hz.png

Just for the sake of it I used Amirm's EQ as a starting point as it had most of the EQ points.
The issue is that the the score optimization requires the regression slope to be as close to 0 as possible therefore it decreased the LF to achieve this.
It probably not as good as the one above for most people for this reason, it illustrates the issue with solely optimizing for the score.

Score no EQ: 66.6
Score Amirm: 89.1
Score Amirm optimized: 100.9

UGREEN HiTune Max5c APO EQ Amirm Optimized Flat@HF 96000Hz.png
 

Attachments

  • UGREEN HiTune Max5c APO EQ Amirm Optimized Flat@HF 96000Hz.txt
    392 bytes · Views: 60
  • UGREEN HiTune Max5c APO EQ Flat@HF 96000Hz.txt
    523 bytes · Views: 63
Last edited:
@amirm Just noticed this thread was posted under headphone amplifier reviews and discussion not the headphone review and discussion section.
Thanks. Just moved it.
 
Where are these available in the USA? I'm not see them in the Jungle, is this an overseas type of order?
 
Back
Top Bottom