- Oct 25, 2019
Some might say its your comprehension skills failing more than their communication skills as the difference between the targets was clear to me and at least one other person. I'm also not sure why you need to go personal with condescending questioning about their understanding, logic and competence in the field. This is a fairly common tactic of yours but ad hominem challenges don't sit well with me.You didn't answer one of my main points, which is that you have an inconsistent approach between boosting the 3-6kHz in both EQ's. You can see from your graphs that you boost the Harman EQ in that area by only about +7dB, see following pic #1, yet on the Reduced High Frequency "Harman Curve" EQ you boost that same area by a massive +11dB (see pic #2 further below) - which is ridiculously inconsistent and counter to the actual targets you're using, because you're boosting the 2nd EQ significantly more even though it has a lower target in that 3-6kHz - that is super illogical and really questions your understanding / logic & competence in this domain. See the red circled parts in the pics below.
View attachment 168297
View attachment 168298
My point also stand about my other main point I brought up, I really don't think you're labelling the difference clearly enough between your two curves to make it clear, if you can't see that or can't figure out a way to make it clearer then I don't quite understand how you don't have those communication skills.
Your question about the levels of boost to the 3K area is valid but your overall approach and attitude towards @Maiky76 in those 2 posts has no place on this forum IMO. If I had these headphones I would be free to try both EQ as well as any others available and make my own mind up. I suggest you let folks do just that as I dont believe you own them either.