We don’t disagree on the underlying facts, only the spin.
And much more compact desktop systems. Here, you have a DAC as an input and maybe a turntable as another. And that is all
The general signal path for a
good desktop system employing passive speakers is:
Sources (typically two, computer and phone, which I agree are both generally handled via common DAC; you mention turntables below but it’s exceeding rare to have a turntable in a nearfield/desktop system) -> DSP that works on
all the content that could come down from all the sources for EQ/room correction, bass management to allow addition of a sub, and maybe adjustable loudness compensation -> amp(s) -> speakers.
The market is also substantially bigger for this type of system. Tons of people buy bookshelf speakers to flank their desk and powered by an amp like this.
So shouldn’t they be steered to complete solutions that provide the tools (automated or manual) to achieve fidelity from a given set of components and not half-assed background music solutions?
And for desktop, this is the definition of a very usable pre-amp.
This has no EQ or bass management, nor any provision to inject such between master volume control and the amplification. Which is where it has to be, to work on
all the content that could come down from all the sources if you consider the balanced and unbalanced inputs separately.
So it simply fails as a “preamp” introduced in 2023. Maybe in 1985 it would’ve been awesome…