Despite all the rant on Topping quality and the heavy promotion of NCore252 based amplifiers in this thread, I have eventually purchased the Topping PA7 amplifier together with its companion the less controversial Topping E70.
I took that decision because
-No NCore are available from a local supplier. And I don’t want to buy from 11000km away
-There is a local Topping reseller with a one year warranty
-It is the first amplifier with significative power below 1000€ in the list of
@Matias https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZlTOYxmPs938gqHjtDABkWS-MApu7uJjzIGnJ2Elm6Y/edit?pli=1#gid=0 and it’s even below 450€.
-It has received the Golfing Panther award. I am not shy to say that I am deeply influenced by
@amirm choices.
I have selected the nonplus option because all my loudspeakers are 8 Ohms nominal and on the Topping website
https://www.tpdz.net/productinfo/999139.html the difference is 125 to 135w at 1% THD ie 0.4dB. And I was not ready to pay 100€ more for less than half a decibel of power.
I have received it and I was immediately delighted. I tried it with my old pairs of Triangle Naia and Triangle Antal 202. It was so good that I decided to upgrade my 22 years old Antal to something better. I have just received a pair of Focal Aria 936. After recalibration of Acourate room correction I can say that I never had a stereo system so good in my life.
Here are some additional information.
Temperature wise it doesn’t get very hot. It gets the same temperature in between whether the DAC or the amplifier is on the top. We have 37degrees C in between DAC and amp. for a room temperature of 25 degrees C after several hours of intensive testing and listening. The power supply doesn’t get hot and can thus easily be hidden in a cabinet.
Below are some measurements I have made to confirm that PA7 or PA7 plus don’t differ much. I am using nonprofessional tools but the excellent A1DA cosmos ADC with Topping isolator HS02 . The generator is the E70 itself on USB and XLR output. The dummy load is made of 4x2Ohms 100W resistors that are also used as a voltage divider. All my loudspeaker being 8 Ohms nominal at 1000Hz I thus used 8 Ohms dummy load except for the first measurement to verify consistency with
@amirm.
Sinad on 4Ohms 5 Watts 20kHz bandwidth is confirmed to be the same as the pa7+ at 102dB
The following are all on 8 Ohms, 0 dbfs is 31.777 V Or 126W
With a load of 8Ohms we have about the same sinad : 103 dB
To tell the truth I was a bit embarrassed by
@amirm measurements “Power versus distortion @4ohms 45kHz bandwidth” as it get a few curves with big bellies. But the worse curves are in the inaudible range.
@amirm was not worried anyway by these curves. I thus wanted to look at what it will look like if we limit the bandwidth to the audible range.
In the legend you have the THD+N of the various frequencies at 10W which is by the way the lowest part of the curves. I believe it is very good.
So in these conditions only the 4kHz curve is a bit naughty. All the others are well tamed. And even the 4kHz is far for being catastrophic. The chart also shows the maximum power without distortion at around 90W.
As it is significant, I am also joining the multitone test at 5W which gives the Pa7 at least 18 bits of distortion free until the highest frequencies.
By the way I am not sure of what is 5W here and if it has the same meaning for all software as the max power is here around 43W during the test. (max -4.65dBfs). The test is severe anyway.
I hope that I have confirmed that the Pa7 is as good as the Pa7+ and I can confirm that it gives me intense pleasure.
I must acknowledge that it is thanks to
@amirm recommendations .