• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping PA5 Review (Amplifier)

Would you mind explaining why maxing the volume on the dac and turning down the amp makes a difference, and why this is more important for unbalanced interconnects?
Improving S/N, as already stated. Also improving ratio between useful signal and hum/buzz voltage, that is created by leakage ac currents (capacitive or ground loop) as a voltage drop across SE cable shield and this unwanted voltage is independent of useful signal. The bigger the ratio useful signal/shield interference voltage drop, the better.
 
search utub for "binaural". they use special dual microphone setup with "human-like" ears. it works. u-tub usess 88kBit AAC - but it still works! :)
Yes but he speaks about 300kHz BW. This is a nonsense in any kind of recording. I do not need to search, I know how high do B&K special mikes go. Still below 100kHz. And how is it going to be reproduced?? This 300kHz / flat phase request is an utter nonsense.
 
300kHz bandwidth is not the same as asking the 44.1kHz bandwidth audio signal to not have a 2usec phase shift within a certain window.

The audio content that gives us the spatial clues is actually in the 1kHz to 8kHz range. It’s not even the tweeter. Even a full range driver limited to 10kHz bandwidth can give sound localization. This localization is encoded in the minute phase shifts of the limited bandwidth sound. We need to remember that as the research and science shows, the human auditory system is capable of detecting microsecond phase information. Not frequency bandwidth.
 
Last edited:
My PA5 just arrived in the mail.

Sadly the speaker output jacks are loose and flopping around as others have mentioned - and the manual makes it very clear that the warranty is "instantly" voided if you open it.

@JohnYang1997 Is it OK to open it up ourselves to repair this issue without voiding the warranty?
 
Quality control poor or missing, I have already mentioned it (when inspecting the teardown photos).
 
Quality control poor or missing, I have already mentioned it (when inspecting the teardown photos).

Indeed it is a little disappointing considering the price.

User experience is quite low. )-:

Edit: I was considering purchasing this amplifier when I see pictures with better solders, cleaner and cleaned PCBs, solid post binding.

Topping have an interest in correcting these assembly faults.
 
Last edited:
To be honest, I don't mind it - it is a simple fix - I just want to confirm that I won't void the warranty.

For this level of performance, at this price - I have set my expectations accordingly.

Since I haven't connected it yet, my first impressions are:
- Decent weight, feels substantial.
- Case is nice and solid
- Well packed

I am looking forward to getting it hooked up.
 
and the manual makes it very clear that the warranty is "instantly" voided if you open it.
This is not legal.

Please take some picture from the inside for us if you open it
 
License the DSP from Dirac and call it a day. Get rid of MQA altogether. Improve the volume knob to something large, tactile and iconic that would generate envy from non-audiophiles and you'll have an international hit on your hands.
Sounds great, though I wonder which good options for volume knobs there are which are large and tactile.
Bit off topic on my part though. :) (Can't be worse than another 5 pages of subjectivist vs objectivist arguments...)
 
Sounds great, though I wonder which good options for volume knobs there are which are large and tactile.
Bit off topic on my part though. :) (Can't be worse than another 5 pages of subjectivist vs objectivist arguments...)

5 pages plus the dozen earlier. It reminds me of a cockfight, it's who's right, also where he works or has worked, on the types of products and so on. To be fun it is, however moderation is lacking on this forum.
 
By the way, I could be wrong and the PFFB is passive (PPFFB) but perhaps higher order than 2nd. As long as the input (into the PPFFB) can be driven high enough (say 10Vrms with frontend OpAmps running from +-15V) the feedback factor can be increased significantly but limited of course by the 21dB "open loop" gain of the chip.
Here's a TPA3255 module with passive PFFB, I increased the negative feedback from 6.9dB to 11.4dB. Gained some 4dB on 1kHz THD+N.
My funky spectrum analyzer might be a limiting factor though.

Sylph-D400+4R+5W.png

4r 5w.PNG


Sylph-D400+4R+10W.png


sylph-d 10w 4r.PNG
 
Last edited:
PA5 Amp is ordered with E50 Dac. Really looking forward to it, should be a nice upgrade from A07.
but the SINAD graph, while having a nice crisp definition now, has the decibel ratings written upside down when you read it as intended with the name of the amps!
 
Here's a TPA3255 module with passive PFFB, I increased the negative feedback from 6.9dB to 11.4dB. Gained some 4dB on 1kHz THD+N.
My funky spectrum analyzer might be a limiting factor though.

View attachment 171330
View attachment 171331

View attachment 171332

View attachment 171333
Thanks for sharing this. As expected, 4dB more feedback (7dB to 11dB) reduces distortion by an equal amount. This will lower the gain as well, probably down to circa 11dB now. So preamp gain will need to increase by 4dB to keep amp output the same.
 
It looks modest. But so do I. Put it inside a box labeled Tiffany & Co., or one labeled Heckler & Koch GmbH, or one labeled Hermes. Soon these amps will be so small that they'll fit into the box you get when you buy a Rolex. So is the significance of this product that high audio performance per our (ASR) standards can be attained using a Class D chip that is reasonably priced and available as opposed to the current class of high performance class D amp modules (ICEpower, Hypex, Purifi) that are more expensive and are significantly larger in size? Some of the functions done on the circuit board of the Hypex and Purify modules are done in the Class D chip thereby reducing the size of the implementation. Again, I assume chips like the Texas Instrument Class D chip(s) are developed for broader market use beyond the consumer audio products.

Thanks for testing this one !

I was wondering: you test output impedance for headphones amps but not for speakers amps.
Is there a reason?
 
Back
Top Bottom