@odyo, I might as well comment on #5
I owned the D10 for 4 months:
- The D10 has a crisper / more outlined treble, less midrange, warm bass tone (which bothered me), rather muted/honky sounding, and good detail as I remember it. The ESS in it is about 6 years old.
- The E30 highs sound like they are coming from an actual space and not as outlined/crisp. It has a neutral tone - I am better able to hear differences from recording to recording. The midrange is huge. Fairly forgiving of recording flaws (seems to highlight the good), such as too much compression. Sounds colourful and expansive. Detail - I'm not sure; that's like comparing detail between two photographs - you don't end up caring about it. The AKM in it is only 2 years old.
The filters all sound the same to me. I left it at the default - short delay, sharp rolloff
I owned the D10 for 4 months:
- The D10 has a crisper / more outlined treble, less midrange, warm bass tone (which bothered me), rather muted/honky sounding, and good detail as I remember it. The ESS in it is about 6 years old.
- The E30 highs sound like they are coming from an actual space and not as outlined/crisp. It has a neutral tone - I am better able to hear differences from recording to recording. The midrange is huge. Fairly forgiving of recording flaws (seems to highlight the good), such as too much compression. Sounds colourful and expansive. Detail - I'm not sure; that's like comparing detail between two photographs - you don't end up caring about it. The AKM in it is only 2 years old.
The filters all sound the same to me. I left it at the default - short delay, sharp rolloff
Last edited: