Why this over something similarly powered and transparent that costs $250?
Please share a link to that amp but only if it is as distortion free and clean above 1Khz as this one is.
Why this over something similarly powered and transparent that costs $250?
Please ignore my ignorance, but since I was thinking of getting a mono block with this type of connections, I have a question. I'm not familiar with this type of connection. From what I have found, the DAC or preamp XLR end would be a female and I think I get that, but the amp connection looks like a keyed TRS connection. I haven't found anything keyed like that and....is the amp connection a mini-TRS or 1/4 inch or......?
The balanced input socket is a combined connector that will accept either 1/4" TRS or XLR. You can use whichever you prefer.Please ignore my ignorance, but since I was thinking of getting a mono block with this type of connections, I have a question. I'm not familiar with this type of connection. From what I have found, the DAC or preamp XLR end would be a female and I think I get that, but the amp connection looks like a keyed TRS connection. I haven't found anything keyed like that and....is the amp connection a mini-TRS or 1/4 inch or......?
How you get the bias voltage is not the difference between class AB and class B operation. I posted a graphic showing what class B operation is, earlier in this thread.My speculation is that they designed a circuit that performs like a class A/B amplifier, but without the biasing diodes, hence calling it class B.
I don't agree, and it's not any kind of "speculation".Totally incorrect.
Also, putting aside the position of power supply within an amplifier architecture, so many tests have been done on power supply interactions (or lack thereof), including replacing Linear PS with SMPS.
The power supply is about the lowest thing on my list of important amplifier features.
It's unfortunate that after page 2 or 3 of these ASR reviews, all sorts of speculation and misinformation on the review subject flourishes.
Not sure what you don't agree with. Firstly, your comment "The power supply is 100% in the signal path in almost all audio amplifier designs" is completely wrong at all levels.I don't agree, and it's not any kind of "speculation".
Now you are saying something different. You are now alluding to different things.The basic architecture of any amplifier is based on the power supply being modulated by the amplified signal. That's why power supply impedance is important. It is a solved problem in general, but it is a problem to be dealt with in the design.
OK, please show. Without an actual example, this is an anecdote.An example:
You can ruin a perfectly good amplifier by powering it from a noisy, high output impedance power supply. Why would that be?
Again, please show.I agree that swapping a perfectly good SMPS with a perfectly good linear power supply will do pretty much nothing. But that does not prove that power supply interactions with audio amplifier circuits don't exist.
We have elite performance with SMPS right here. Whatever problems there might have been have been solved with engineering, and have been for a long time.Totally agreed on your comments about power supply quality and cost. The power supply is 100% in the signal path in almost all audio amplifier designs, so for elite performance you want a bulletproof, quiet and preferably over-spec'd PSU. That inevitably costs more money. SMPS are getting better all the time, though. But there is that switching frequency issue to filter out -- and the filter costs extra money too.
No problem with smps per see , I don’t think I own anything with a so called linear supply anymore ? Benchmark did the rigth thing to use it thier amp .We have elite performance with SMPS right here. Whatever problems there might have been have been solved with engineering, and have been for a long time.
Here:Where is it written that the "seller" cannot sell a product that has higher consumption?
Please share a link to that amp but only if it is as distortion free and clean above 1Khz as this one is.
Or.... don't use it to claim regulatory compliance or not. That was not the purpose of providing the data.In that case the measurement needs qualification with an error bound, or removing entirely as misleading. I suppose it may depend on input voltage too.
It was in email to me from them. But now maybe that was a typo although I don't think so.@amirm - Is that mention of class B operation a typo? Or did that information come directly from Topping?
Topping FacebookThat's even stranger!
I don't know what to make of this.
Maybe it's a marketing strategy. Calling it class B would generate a lot of buzz, but calling it class AB would not differentiate it from the crowd of other class AB amplifiers. But I really don't know.
The Purifi will also be at 1% when the distortion reaches 1%.PURIFI 1ET400A 4Ω THD+N 1kHz 100W = 0.00015%
TOPPING B100 4Ω THD+N 1kHz 100W ≈ 1%
PURIFI 1ET400A 4Ω 20Hz-20kHz THD+N 100W = 0.00017% !