ommadusk
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2022
- Messages
- 134
- Likes
- 50
Hi,
I have both these amplifiers in my possession so I've been able to compare them. It's not blind tested. I originally got the NcoreX a couple of weeks ago and I had the Purifi held in customs for a time and I decided at the last minute to get the Purifi as well. It's common belief here that these two SOTA amps will sound the same. I decided to get compare them when I saw this post https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...0-class-d-amplifier-review.41007/post-1689271. Somebody at Audiophonics thinks they sounded different so that was enough to make me want to compare them.
There is a caveat. If anyone's been reading my posts lately I've been having a few issues with crackling, noise, and unbalanced sound in my speakers, and I have not completely determined that the NcoreX is not faulty. However these problems have been intermittent and they've not appeared for a few days. It may have been because I wasn't screwing the speaker wires in well enough. In short, I don't think that's relevant to the comparison but it might be.
Firstly, I found the NcoreX really good. I use stereo speakers for both TV and music. I takes me 4 minutes to take out the speaker wires and XLR cables so I'm not able to immediately compare and people don't rememeber sound very well that makes comparison difficult. But still possible. When I'm listening to dialogue on TV I can hear everything much better with the Purifi. There is a lack of detail with the NcoreX and there's a slight harshness to the sound. I play TV at a lower volume generally than I do with music. With music I can hear a difference as well and I prefer the Purifi.
That's it. I can hear a difference between the two amplifiers. I know it's not popular to say this. I prefer the Purifi over the NcoreX. Btw I don't claim I've got amazing hearing because I've got some hearing loss. The difference is obvious, especially when listening to dialogue on TV. Please bear in mind the caveat that I spoke of.
I have both these amplifiers in my possession so I've been able to compare them. It's not blind tested. I originally got the NcoreX a couple of weeks ago and I had the Purifi held in customs for a time and I decided at the last minute to get the Purifi as well. It's common belief here that these two SOTA amps will sound the same. I decided to get compare them when I saw this post https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...0-class-d-amplifier-review.41007/post-1689271. Somebody at Audiophonics thinks they sounded different so that was enough to make me want to compare them.
There is a caveat. If anyone's been reading my posts lately I've been having a few issues with crackling, noise, and unbalanced sound in my speakers, and I have not completely determined that the NcoreX is not faulty. However these problems have been intermittent and they've not appeared for a few days. It may have been because I wasn't screwing the speaker wires in well enough. In short, I don't think that's relevant to the comparison but it might be.
Firstly, I found the NcoreX really good. I use stereo speakers for both TV and music. I takes me 4 minutes to take out the speaker wires and XLR cables so I'm not able to immediately compare and people don't rememeber sound very well that makes comparison difficult. But still possible. When I'm listening to dialogue on TV I can hear everything much better with the Purifi. There is a lack of detail with the NcoreX and there's a slight harshness to the sound. I play TV at a lower volume generally than I do with music. With music I can hear a difference as well and I prefer the Purifi.
That's it. I can hear a difference between the two amplifiers. I know it's not popular to say this. I prefer the Purifi over the NcoreX. Btw I don't claim I've got amazing hearing because I've got some hearing loss. The difference is obvious, especially when listening to dialogue on TV. Please bear in mind the caveat that I spoke of.