mccririck
Active Member
Not really. One way *thinks* it's rooted in science and proof...Not really. One way is rooted in science and proof and the other way is rooted in hearsay and misinformation.
Not really. One way *thinks* it's rooted in science and proof...Not really. One way is rooted in science and proof and the other way is rooted in hearsay and misinformation.
It is not thinking. Everything about audio is indeed science. To think that somehow all of this audio technology came to be without any science at all is absolutely absurd. Literally every single bit of the audio world is based around science.Not really. One way *thinks* it's rooted in science and proof...
Not all R2R dacs are worse, Holo Audio (and seemingly to a degree Denafrips as well) for instance makes R2R DACs that measure pretty competitively w/ the top tier delta sigma dacs. I personally haven't heard any but some audio folks seem to like them subjectively at least. Idk if its the money talking or if its really any different though.Just stumbled upon this on the SMSL website; looks like they decided to build it because of all the people chasing R2R distortion for some reason... still don't understand why you would want to have ancient tech that performs worse.
Yea, because they like low detail music. They should just buy a top tier $100 dac and then some $50 headphones so they can keep their music low detail.
But did anyone even listen to this in a high end system? This is craziness! I tried this DAC out and it sounds incredible.Thank you Amir for the review!
I am also surprised that SMSL couldn't do better with R2R design.
Denafrips Ares, Amir tested, measured slightly better at least and is cheaper.
What is a High End system? How would that be anything relevant to measurements with an AP?But did anyone even listen to this in a high end system?
Good call.I tried this DAC out and it sounds incredible
Sure it is...This is craziness!
well, if everything else in the system sounds good, I am pretty sure any dac above SINAD of 90ish would sound good, if it got some gimmick for psychological effects it will sound even better.But did anyone even listen to this in a high end system? This is craziness! I tried this DAC out and it sounds incredible.
Not really the way things work here, these would tether trust a machine than their ears. But did anyone even listen to this in a high end system? This is craziness! I tried this DAC out and it sounds incredible.
Except a DAC does not product sound.You’ll get blasted for asking about something that is built to produce sound, sounds…..
Define "high end"But did anyone even listen to this in a high end system? This is craziness! I tried this DAC out and it sounds incredible.
outside of this little microcosm i doubt anyone calls cheap but good stuff "high end"
god you guys need to get out of your bubble
its not that I dont agree that there's good stuff to be had for cheap like a Topping D10S but... "high end" because that's what I think the chart says??? jesus christ
What's the inverse then, "high end" because it costs a lot of money? This D3 doesn't look very high end in any case. If someone is buying audio jewellery, one could do better..."high end" because that's what I think the chart says??? jesus christ
So how would you define it? Overpriced? Rated by "experts", most of whom are old enough to have hearing loss? Or, to be generous, expensive with good build and finish and adequate performance?outside of this little microcosm i doubt anyone calls cheap but good stuff "high end"
god you guys need to get out of your bubble
its not that I dont agree that there's good stuff to be had for cheap like a Topping D10S but... "high end" because that's what I think the chart says??? jesus christ