ray_parkhurst
Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2023
- Messages
- 95
- Likes
- 99
The REF stylus purpose is twofold: ensure test record consistency; and give a reference vs the DUT. How do the DUT and REF responses compare at this point?
-
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Phonograph Stylus Wear Experiment
- Thread starter BendBound
- Start date
You've completely incorrect HF response for the cart that is unexplained - I didn't bother looking any further, and really don't see the point in doing so. All the data is suspect at this point.
Icewater_7
Member
So far, no plots of Pluto 2 data have been published here yet, correct?
I believe this plot was made from the recording of the experiment stylus and the Pluto 2:
Attachments
Icewater_7
Member
It was not explicitly identified in that post. All plots should clearly identify the DUT.
It's not an 'official' plot as an experimental result - the labeling was very intentional.
Icewater_7
Member
Ah, my bad again, I didn't recall that experimental plots had "BMMR Test" identifying the DUT and it's signal chain in the plot itself, so not required in the author's textual portion. I'm still not sure if Pluto 2 had the 16K peak or not and if the newest proposal from ASR is implying that the test should start over completely with the Pluto 2 or some other equipment.
"Pluto 1" plots show a significant LF roll-off, slight mid range elevation, and as-expected HF with the 10.5kHz peak that is characteristic for the VM95 series. "Pluto 2" shows a much smaller LF roll-off, as-expected mid range, but a +6dB peak at 16kHz where with the loading as guesstimated (250pF) we should see a ~+1dB peak at 10.5kHz.
It appears something is rather significantly off, and that should absolutely be identified. I think the advice is as it always was - verify the electronics and measurement data before beginning an experiment, multiple laybacks to identify and average-out errors like the ~3dB left channel drop in the HF of the first plot, etc.
I'll not be spending anymore time on this as-is.
Icewater_7
Member
Thanks for the well reasoned summary. I agree that scientific test methodology should aggressively control variables and validate all equipment in the test setup to be certain that it is capable of measuring the information sought without introducing uncertainties of its own into the output data.
phn
Member
What an interesting topic, just found this, subscribing. Hopefully you'll have the new tests running again soon! Thank you for your efforts, it is amazing something like this has not really been made earlier.
Icewater_7
Member
Stylus Wear Study 2 - Page 14- Vinyl Engine
- Thread Starter
- #252
Thank you Icewater_7 for posting this link. I've been traveling overseas since August and only now am able to update this thread.
Our team will not longer be posting updates to our stylus physical wear experiment on this website. Please pick up this topic here, primarily:
Stylus Wear Study 2, On Vinyl Engine.
On the Vinyl Engine thread there are a few posters, one in particular, who demonstrate capabilities to evaluate on-going sonic distortion in our dubs of CBS test records, while evaluating those results is only a secondary goal. Presently, we are at T192 hours of physical wear. Recall, the primary and intial purpose of this experiment is to catelog progressive physical wear of the stylus.
Also, follow this thread on the Steve Hoffman Forum for the same experiment.
Phonograph Stylus Wear Experiment, Steve Hoffman Forum.
Thank you for your interest.
Our team will not longer be posting updates to our stylus physical wear experiment on this website. Please pick up this topic here, primarily:
Stylus Wear Study 2, On Vinyl Engine.
On the Vinyl Engine thread there are a few posters, one in particular, who demonstrate capabilities to evaluate on-going sonic distortion in our dubs of CBS test records, while evaluating those results is only a secondary goal. Presently, we are at T192 hours of physical wear. Recall, the primary and intial purpose of this experiment is to catelog progressive physical wear of the stylus.
Also, follow this thread on the Steve Hoffman Forum for the same experiment.
Phonograph Stylus Wear Experiment, Steve Hoffman Forum.
Thank you for your interest.
Last edited:
Something like that. It is why I gave up on trying to take vinyl records seriously. Incidentally, does anyone know if those spectrogram programs on computers show the same amount of distortion (about 10%, or the spectrogram 1920x1080 of a FLAC file is less than 1% distortion)?
Last edited:
Most cartridges today have relatively (!) heavy aluminium tube or solid rod exotic cantilevers - their cantilever/tip resonance is often around the 15kHz mark - and that resonance will increase mistracking, resulting in increased distortion. (all theoretical...)
It would be interesting to get something like the Dynavector Karat and measure distortion at 15kHz.... we might find that the distortion is an order of magnitude lower simply because the cantilever/needle resonance is up at circa 50Khz and of no consequence to tracking at 15kHz...
What about those MC pickups the frequency response is specified to 45 or 50 kHz, usable for CD4? They cannot have such a low resonance.
Actually those exotic tube cantilevers and the line contact needles were all designed to better pick up the carrier frequencies of CD4.
With regards to effectiveness of CD4 tracking - well how many people today bother trying it? How many actually test that frequency response? - There are very few test records with tracks extending up to or past 50kHz... and I doubt most vinyl presses today would be capable of producing records with frequencies going that high (reliably).
I've measured those resonances on V15V's, AT440, AT152 and a bunch of other cartridges.... courtesy of a spreadsheet which models the electrical parts of the response, deducts that from the measure F/R and provides me with the "raw" F/R - where the resonance is usually obviously exposed (I'll need to dig up some of those measurements I made 10 to 12 years ago and post some examples...)
Certainly. But they also track better in the audible range, I think.
Even in the hidays of CD4 those quadrophonic records probably were good for much less number of plays than stereo recordings.
Did you measure one of the AT MC pickups like the AT33PTG/II (the one I bought this year) or the AT-OC9XML, by change? Or one of the Van den Hul pickups (those are all specified to 50 kHz and higher)?
Yep
Yep
No, I don't own an AT MC... I have measured a Sony MC, and I also have a close relative of the VanDenHul - which is an Empire MC1 (late 80's) - it is however one of the more basic models, without an exotic cantilever, and with only an elliptical tip. At the time Emprie and VdH partnered up and did a series of MC's which were effectively re-badged VdH MC's, the current "Frog", MC10, and MC1, all still use the same housing as my own 40 year old Empire MC1, I have no idea whether the innards are also the same or have changed over the decades.
The specification to 50kHz and higher is a little meaningless on many of these (as per my previous comments) - one way of measuring at a higher frequency is to run the test record at 48RPM rather than 33... which extends frequency range by 1/3rd roughly... but it gets complicated as you then need to adjust for RIAA decoding. I did a few wider range tests that way about a decade ago.
The test to 50Khz would be relatively meaningless with my MC1 given the elliptical tip isn't capable of tracing that high a frequency, so it absolutely will be mistracking, affecting the results accordingly (and wearing the test record in the process as well!)
On second thought, that resolution shows about 0.1% distortion (if one compares the same vinyl record from another playback of course).
Last edited:
I have yet to read the thread, but I am highly interested! I have been an audiophile for 50 years and have always wondered how often to replace the stylus. Back in the late '70s, '80s, and 90's, there was a company (still around), called The Last Factory. They made a product called Stylast Stylus Treatment, which purported to extend the life of a stylus. They also made a product called Last Record Preservative. These products (mostly the Record Preservative) made quite an impact in the audiophile industry, even to the mainstream part of it. The Last Record Preservative was also tested by some of the major mags and the esoteric ones and was highly regarded. It would be interesting to test these products now that we can do it empirically. Anybody interested?
thelastfactory.com
thelastfactory.com
And an answer to a FAQ (could be very old):
Dear Mr. P.,
As part of the original R&D project in which we developed the Record Preservative, we were getting strong indications of increased stylus lifetime, both wear and suspension. Once the record preservative was on the market, we began an exhaustive series of test and experiments that eventually led to Stylast. We now have a collection of cartridges and replacement styli in which we are comfortable claiming stylus life extension of 10 times (and more).
Stylus usefulness and lifetime are determined by two characteristics: One is physical wear of the contact faces of the stylus, and the second is the condition of the stylus suspension system. Over time, wear of the contact faces becomes apparent as noise, distortion, and can be seen with microscopic examination. Stylus suspension failure can be of two types: The first is hardening of the elastomeric components, and the other is collapse of the suspension during use. Both of these failure types are addressed by Stylast.
Although Stylast is applied to the stylus tip, it does work its way upward along the cantilever section of the stylus. The suspension has rubber/elastic components, and Stylast absorbs into the material and prevents it from hardening (due to age and exposure to dry air).
We can measure the lifetime of a stylus not just through careful listening, but from observing oscilloscope images of the sound waves. As the stylus deteriorates we can see distortion appear in the wave form. We were able to perform side-by-side tests of treated and untreated stylii, and compare the wave forms to prove that Stylus did prevent deterioration by a factor of 10. We also took pictures of the stylii with an ordinary microscope to document the contact face degradation. Stylast delayed that damage as well.
Exhaustive listening, and the microscope/oscilloscope studies in our lab support our claims for increased stylus lifetime.
Thank you for your query, and we wish you much enjoyment with your music!
Sincerely,
Walter and Christine
Clean and Protect Vinyl Records and Magnetic Tape
Preserve and protect your vintage media! LAST Factory products clean and preserve vinyl records, magnetic tapes, and CDs.
thelastfactory.com
Stylus Care Archives
LAST products provide the best stylus care in the industry. Clean with Stylus Cleaner, and extend the life of your stylus with Stylast Stylus Protector.
thelastfactory.com
And an answer to a FAQ (could be very old):
Dear Mr. P.,
As part of the original R&D project in which we developed the Record Preservative, we were getting strong indications of increased stylus lifetime, both wear and suspension. Once the record preservative was on the market, we began an exhaustive series of test and experiments that eventually led to Stylast. We now have a collection of cartridges and replacement styli in which we are comfortable claiming stylus life extension of 10 times (and more).
Stylus usefulness and lifetime are determined by two characteristics: One is physical wear of the contact faces of the stylus, and the second is the condition of the stylus suspension system. Over time, wear of the contact faces becomes apparent as noise, distortion, and can be seen with microscopic examination. Stylus suspension failure can be of two types: The first is hardening of the elastomeric components, and the other is collapse of the suspension during use. Both of these failure types are addressed by Stylast.
Although Stylast is applied to the stylus tip, it does work its way upward along the cantilever section of the stylus. The suspension has rubber/elastic components, and Stylast absorbs into the material and prevents it from hardening (due to age and exposure to dry air).
We can measure the lifetime of a stylus not just through careful listening, but from observing oscilloscope images of the sound waves. As the stylus deteriorates we can see distortion appear in the wave form. We were able to perform side-by-side tests of treated and untreated stylii, and compare the wave forms to prove that Stylus did prevent deterioration by a factor of 10. We also took pictures of the stylii with an ordinary microscope to document the contact face degradation. Stylast delayed that damage as well.
Exhaustive listening, and the microscope/oscilloscope studies in our lab support our claims for increased stylus lifetime.
Thank you for your query, and we wish you much enjoyment with your music!
Sincerely,
Walter and Christine
Similar threads
