• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Nordost Tyr 2 Review (USB Cable)

Rate this product:

  • 1. Waste of money (piggy bank panther)

    Votes: 498 96.7%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 4 0.8%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 3 0.6%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 10 1.9%

  • Total voters
    515
My science teacher clearly was not a trained audiophile when he taught us that energy is not transferred via the wire.
Would there be a market for selling audiophile EM fields?

Apparently so.

Add-powr snake oil.PNG
 
Once again, this proves that the only consideration when buying a cable should be it’s construction as related to durability. About $10-$20 should do the trick on most.
 
I will admit that i have purchased one RCA cable over another, at the same price, on Amazon over only looks.

None of my rca cables are even within sight but there are a variety of aesthetic choices without paying silly prices for 'em, too.
 
I will admit that i have purchased one RCA cable over another, at the same price, on Amazon over only looks.
I've spent more money for a cable that looks/feels better than other. Not a lot of money, but something (aside from my one audioquest RCA I bought before I knew better, although it does look nice). That's a totally normal thing to do!

I looked at Nordost's website. My god. They have so many tiers and levels of cables. They all look the same aside from color, really. I'd love for one of their engineers try to explain to me what the differences are.
 
I've spent more money for a cable that looks/feels better than other. Not a lot of money, but something (aside from my one audioquest RCA I bought before I knew better, although it does look nice). That's a totally normal thing to do!
We have a whole thread dedicated to that. I have contributed my bit to the thread.
 
The only way to properly test the sonic quality of any USB cable is to turn it into an audio cable. Cut off the connectors and wire it up to some XLR connectors and see how it performs as far as noise immunity, frequency response, and cable specs such as LCR. Then, and only then, will we have the answer that so many seek.

I'd say it's the other way around, since USB requires much wider bandwidth than 20 kHz audio, and the connectors are all part of that.

The "right" solution probably involves some time making a couple breakout boards (and yes, layout does matter in this case) that will allow them to be connected to suitable test equipment. But before that matters, does Amir have a network analyzer?

In this limited case we are only interested in how the cable performs as an audio interconnect—in the analog domain—not as a digital signal transmission medium. It can be tested against any of the top tier commercial star-quad cables or even something like Mogami 3173.
 
I've spent more money for a cable that looks/feels better than other. Not a lot of money, but something (aside from my one audioquest RCA I bought before I knew better, although it does look nice). That's a totally normal thing to do!

I looked at Nordost's website. My god. They have so many tiers and levels of cables. They all look the same aside from color, really. I'd love for one of their engineers try to explain to me what the differences are.
I'm sure they won't. I'm sure they'd point us to the "specs."
 
I guess somebody has to take the money of people who have too much and spend 1400$ for a USB-Cable
 
Back
Top Bottom