As in 2008 there's people who can make money out of these events , while the rest of us pay for it. Hence the increase in inequality.
So thus far, get plenty of vitamin D, and use some of that acid reflux medicine Pepcid (famotidine) if you get Covid 19. Is that current SOTA for home health aids if you contract Covid 19? Have I missed others?Abstract(not yet peer reviewed) -- Vitamin D may reduce covid-19 severity by supressing cytokine storm. More research needed.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.08.20058578v3
I don't know, but I take D3, C, and zinc daily.So thus far, get plenty of vitamin D, and use some of that acid reflux medicine Pepcid (famotidine) if you get Covid 19. Is that current SOTA for home health aids if you contract Covid 19? Have I missed others?
So thus far, get plenty of vitamin D, and use some of that acid reflux medicine Pepcid (famotidine) if you get Covid 19. Is that current SOTA for home health aids if you contract Covid 19? Have I missed others?
Useless reply. Bleach is damaging. Pepcid and vitamin D3 aren't. Even if they don't help they do no harm. And they might help. Read the Hippocratic oath.Bleach. It comes highly recommended. View attachment 62425
And more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unproven_methods_against_COVID-19
Useless reply. Bleach is damaging. Pepcid and vitamin D3 aren't. Even if they don't help they do no harm. And they might help. Read the Hippocratic oath.
Useless reply. Bleach is damaging. Pepcid and vitamin D3 aren't. Even if they don't help they do no harm. And they might help. Read the Hippocratic oath.
I'd say whatever works for you (or me!) in terms of handling the stress caused by the situation as long as it isn't dangerous or expensive. People definitely need to feel somewhat in control when facing a chronic stress. It's not even a question of effectiveness, it is just better from a psychological point of view than being passive, much better than drinking oneself into oblivion and infinitely better than beating one's wife
Proposing unproven treatments for others is not helpful to them.
Yes, I agree in general. The chloroquine saga was the epitome of that and there was a clear, established risk.
That being said, we still need ways to deal with stress.
If someone was just stating "I am taking daily Vit D3 and pepcid" outside of any context, no one would bat an eye.
In the "I am taking daily Vit D3 and pepcid to prevent Covid-19" sentence, only the second part is mildly problematic. But I still think the feeling of being in control (even if unjustified) has benefits.
There's some fairly decent evidence on the benefits of Vit D3 when there is an initial deficiency, much less or none on the benefits when the levels are OK to begin with. No real risk of overdosing either (unlike Vit A for example). So, not worth a fight imho...
I don't perceive @Blumlein 88 as advocating in favor of a preventative treatment but rather as sharing how he copes with the situation.
Currently if I call the doctor with possible COVID19 symptoms he'll maybe get me tested for it. Or not. If positive, he'll propose staying at home and doing nothing unless you start having more severe problems.Proposing unproven treatments for others is not helpful to them.
I'd say whatever works for you (or me!) in terms of handling the stress caused by the situation as long as it isn't dangerous or expensive. People definitely need to feel somewhat in control when facing a chronic stress. It's not even a question of effectiveness, it is just better from a psychological point of view than being passive, much better than drinking oneself into oblivion and infinitely better than beating one's wife
Currently if I call the doctor with possible COVID19 symptoms he'll maybe get me tested for it. Or not. If positive, he'll propose staying at home and doing nothing unless you start having more severe problems.
There is at least a credible hint having D3 levels higher goes along with less severity. There is at least a credible hint that pepcid may lessen severity. The effective risk of either of those is zero. The relative cost is negligible.
If 6 months from now they've determined D3 and pepcid to be helpful they'd start telling people to take those if they contract the disease. This is hardly like suggesting someone take a malaria drug which isn't readily available and has real risks using it. That would only make sense if the benefit has been determined, and it is administered by a doctor.
If you choose to try these unproven treatments is one thing. Proposing them for others is another matter. You are acting beyond your remit
So proposing unproven treatment might not be helpful (there is a little chance at least that it is helpful), but since there is no known helpful treatment at all, and there is no harm I don't see the problem.