I agree you'd just confuse the sales effort in a showroom. But I don't think it would hurt to have a PDF download available for the technically literate buyers.I feel like klippel data destroys the air of mystique which sells these products.
I agree you'd just confuse the sales effort in a showroom. But I don't think it would hurt to have a PDF download available for the technically literate buyers.I feel like klippel data destroys the air of mystique which sells these products.
Very tiny percentage.I agree you'd just confuse the sales effort in a showroom. But I don't think it would hurt to have a PDF download available for the technically literate buyers.
Perhaps, I don't know. Even if you are retiring on $10mm, this is a pretty foolhardy purchase. It means your stereo cost about a year of pre-tax retirement income (given that a sustainable spend rate in 30 years of retirement should be around or below 4% before tax, see below)
What If Retirees Don't Want To Run Out Of Money In 30 Years? | Retirement Researcher
Traditional findings assume that retirees will use a withdrawal rate that will leave no wealth after the final withdrawal in the 30th year of retirement.retirementresearcher.com
True enough, but I think a good salesman could use that as part of the spiel, depending on the buyer.Very tiny percentage.
Keith
I would appreciate that very much.So I should close the thread just Becaue you don't like them ?
Depends on your definition of “ultra conservative”. Take a look at the table in that article. Kind of gives one pause (And remember you’ll have to pay tax before you buy your Magico speakers).ultra conservative 4% rule of thumb
Paradigms from this series are famously top-heavy in frequency response. Seems like a design approach, not necessarily materials.
5F
3F
3F again. I auditioned these, and found them really toppy and thin-sounding relative to KEFs that day. You can see why. My first impression was 'wow you can hear the bow sounds on strings', then 'wow, this is really annoying'.
Again and again people say I have to listen to speakers to understand if I like them. But over time, I've learned that these kinds of deviation from linear response absolutely correspond to what you will hear. This is, I believe, a very low distortion speaker, so you could probably EQ the on-axis presentation to the right place, but you'd still have some dispersion anomalies. But why bother when you can do better for less? So I'd call this a speaker you can cross off simply based on measurements.
I would appreciate that very much.
Employers are completely entitled to hold higher ethical standards than mere lawfulnessI realise Focals aren’t everyone’s cup of tea but to get fired because you have a pair…
Keith
Employers are completely entitled to hold higher ethical standards than mere lawfulness
Not really. Maybe they mean they're something like LR4 and they get them into phase alignment. Which I'd say is simply normal competent procedure, but we've seen what other high-end speakers do.
I think there's some real engineering and quality there. Worth the money? Dunno.
Yeah. I'm eventually convinced they must spend serious money on engineering and quality.I think there's some real engineering and quality there. Worth the money? Dunno.
You don't get the measured performance they have by the voodoo "by ear" techniques other high-end manufacturers seem to enjoy. If I was a mastering engineer, Magico would be on my short list.Yeah. I'm eventually convinced they must spend serious money on engineering and quality.
But they're more audiophile speakers than pro studio monitorsYou don't get the measured performance they have by the voodoo "by ear" techniques other high-end manufacturers seem to enjoy. If I was a mastering engineer, Magico would be on my short list.
Those Morel motors look great!