Having said that and scanning this thread, the Avalon speakers do look most interesting to me, as I like the triangular theme most seem to have. No idea otherwise and I suspect the start at astronomical prices and go up from there. The top Beolab model is simply far too fussy even if it does perform rather well for such an ornament.I would start by looking at really fine measuring loudspeakers irrespective of price.
Keith
Hi - I have listened to all of the speakers you mention (of the two Estelons mostly the X Diamond) and would personally and subjectively agree with your experience, preferring the Estelon sound (tuning) to the Magic s3 (I prefer the bigger Magicos - but they are stratospherically priced!).WOW. There really was no comparison. I know sound is subjective, but for me, in that room, with that gear,....it wasn't even close. The Estelon's had some voodoo that just worked for me. They then asked me if I wanted to hear something from Magico that was similarly priced, and swapped speakers for the Magico S3. Again....WOW! The B&W sound that I have lived with and loved for 20+ years....just was not even in the same ball park as the Estelon and Magico speakers.
The shop guy could tell I was in love and asked if I wanted to demo the next step up, the Estelon X Diamond. These were much more expensive speakers, but the bass extension difference was clearly better and they sounded amazing.
Interestingly, that's the first impression I had when I walked into the room with the big Estelons at SWAF. I bit muddy bass, not as defined as I'd like.It sounds like you are set on the Estelon, but the M3 are truly spectacular, and objectively, based on what I learned to expect from both companies, are superior (and do sound better, IMO). The Estelon are definitely not "bigger" in the bottom they're more bloated. Just my 2c. it's a big investment; you don't want to make a mistake
It sounds like you are set on the Estelon, but the M3 are truly spectacular, and objectively, based on what I learned to expect from both companies, are superior (and do sound better, IMO). The Estelon are definitely not "bigger" in the bottom they're more bloated. Just my 2c. it's a big investment; you don't want to make a mistake
Both speakers were amazing. But for me...it was definitely the Estelon. The new "special edition" will take 10-12 weeks to get. Gives me time to work on the room. Need to make it look as special as these speakers. Will post pics once they have arrived. Thanks for all the opinions and advice!Interestingly, that's the first impression I had when I walked into the room with the big Estelons at SWAF. I bit muddy bass, not as defined as I'd like.
Maybe so, but the big Estelon room at SWAF was quite large and there was nobody hanging around the back. I still think I would describe the bass as "busy" or "untidy".‘Bloated‘ bass is often the. speaker interacting with the room, particularly as many visitors tend to hover at the back of the room.
Keith
Again...appreciate all the suggestions, comments and responses. I'm nearing the end of my planning journey and will begin execution shortly. I attended Southwest Audio Fest and thoroughly enjoyed hearing/seeing/touching all sorts of speakers and other components. For some reason, I kept gravitating back to the rooms with the Estelon and Magico speakers.
Just yesterday, I spent another few hours with my dealer auditioning the Estelon X Diamond and Magico M3 in a room about the size of the room I am doing at home, with some of the same components as well. Pictures below:
View attachment 364932
View attachment 364933
Both sounded amazing, tight and balanced, but the Estelon felt a little bigger in the lower-end. I think I've settled on the Estelon X Diamond, but am exploring the new X Diamond Signature's just released also. The form factor really does it for me and I love the sound of theses speakers also. As far as colors, I will decorate the room around color of speaker, but really like the red Estelon's...
View attachment 364936
Not surprising, see the bass response. This can be imposing for some for sure.The Estelon are definitely not "bigger" in the bottom they're more bloated.
I just saw this post and come in late, this is what I saw also, both this and the magico is much more neutral and with very good directivity, and for me, the OP is really demoed how a more neutral speaker can sound compared to the "trust your ears" initial impression of the modern B&Ws, welcome down the ship of the measurementNot surprising, see the bass response. This can be imposing for some for sure.
View attachment 366799
https://www.stereophile.com/content/estelon-xb-diamond-mk2-loudspeaker-measurementsf
Interesting, having both the 800D and the S5 Mk2, I prefer the latter for stage-width, voices and bass accuracy (again, in my room). So actually my impression is the reverse.I had a chance to listen to Magico S5 Mk2 driven by Vitus SS-025 Amplifier last week.
It sounds very smooth and has good extended lower octave bass compare to B&W 800D3. However , the 800D3 has better bass definition on higher octave bass.
I personally prefer the 800D3 midrange purity and sense of presence with its D3 tweeter .
Overall, both are awesome .
800D3 presentation is more dynamic and good for active listening. Magico S5 is more laid back for background music .
The sales person recommend Magico M6 to get the dynamic and soundstage of the B&W 800D3 .
We think the 800D3 is like Porsche 992 GT3 that holds value and good performance for the price and Magico S5 is Maclaren Artura.