They do not seem very tall. The recommended stands tilt them backwards a bit. Wouldn't it be better to put them on something like this?
The tilt sometimes helps with a narrow vertical sweet spot. For example, the JBL L82 has a significant on-axis deviation if you are just a few degrees above the reference axis, and it was much better to be below the reference axis than above it.
(Note that my chosen reference axis was a little higher than what JBL used, so the difference might be exaggerated here, but still, the speaker is clearly better heard below the reference axis than above it).
The above-axis deviation isn't as audible as it looks because of room interaction, but still less than ideal. By tilting the speaker slightly, one makes it less likely to be caught in the "bad zone" of the speaker, such as when standing up.
It could also help control the floor and ceiling reflections, the former in particular, to make them a bit more friendly to a typical room. Often times lobing happens at very narrow angles, and just a small change in angle can be the difference between a large dip or a relatively smooth reflected sound .
Not
necessarily the case here, but some possible reasons I noted with the L100 and L82 in particular. In my old apartment, where the couch was in the middle of the room, I always preferred having my speakers slightly lower than my listening position and angling upward so that I would have better sound when standing up.
Surprisingly lumpy DI and FR curves, but mostly because of vertical dispersion anomalies it seems.
Yeah, I appreciate that JBL has started to include horizontal DI curves. That one looks quite smooth so imaging will likely be strong. There might just be some slight tonal unevenness around 1kHz.
Smoothing is higher than I'd like to see though. Looks like 1/6 of an octave for some reason.