I agree that we have no where near enough information...but what I can understand in the translated page (the text on the graphics means nothing to me) is generally positive
...
So, not enough information to tell, but if I lived where I could get them at $400 (pair or each?) delivered, I would consider them if I needed speakers.
Most of those aren't actually counter-points... they're what I was saying - i.e. that it's
too good to be true based on marketing at least (not that they're alone in that of course).
- 3-way design is fine, but significantly add to cost and usually (IME) decrease sensitivity, not increase it. The three speakers you mentioned are less sensitive (in most cases by
[email protected],1M), have smaller, cheaper drivers (material wise at least), and with the exception of the kit-form of the HiVi's are all more expensive...
even on sale.
- As I said, heavy
is good - which is why well braced cabinet kits can cost almost as much as these assembled speakers do.
- The crossover not only looks great, it's without significant compromise apparently - and the one compromise made isn't likely the crossover's fault (the weird bass response). Again cost (components and assembly).
- The efficiency being specified at 89dB@1W/1M isn't an issue, but that's
[email protected],1M (preferred IMO) - again not bad... it's
unbelievably good actually.
- They do provide FR in chart form (just not method, polars, smoothing, etc.) - it looks like +2/-4dB 80Hz-20kHz and -21db @40Hz - an odd spec for "40Hz-30kHz" specified... it might be good, or it might be crap on the high-end as well but who knows. This is
not as good - but again weird that an 8" driver in a ported cabinet with the specified overall sensitivity struggles that much at 50Hz (or even 60Hz).
- You are correct, they could be someone else's drivers with their own logo'd stickers and part numbers - that was a mistake on my part calling them "proprietary" - how about "house parts of unknown provenance"? My point was that if they aren't in-house drivers, that will again likely drive the price point up.
- Walk around a Chery dealership and tell me they paid for their IP... but fair enough, they could be the OEM and just inherited everything. I could actually see that scenario much easier.
- All I can see is in the back (although I can assume the front baffle is the same - and likely thicker). Again, this is
good if it's everywhere.
- They look cheap to me - but that's totally subjective. To put that in context, I found the
Monitor Audio Platinum's with the leather treatment to look cheap too and those were $5K/pair. These have a price point that makes cheap make sense, and if you like the look then it's a win-win.
Some companies in the PRC are able to create economies of scale unheard of elsewhere - often through abysmal employee compensation and a complete disregard for safety & environmental standards. The exceptions to this have products which aren't dramatically cheaper than those manufactured elsewhere and to their credit, aren't lesser in terms of build quality and reliability either. There's a huge difference between putting a well engineered PCB in a nice aluminum case (Topping,SMSL/Sabaj, etc.) and a hand assembled, 3-way stand-mount speaker... with mostly amazing specifications... yet somehow they did it for nearly the same price. As I said, I'd love to see them tested, measured and reviewed.
If I was local to them - I would definitely grab a pair to see... but I'd not be surprised to find it really was too good to be true for <$400.