• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

MQA Sounds Really Good!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,198
Likes
16,927
Location
Central Fl
I'll always buy a hard copy of things I really like. What happens when the internet is down?
 

Snarfie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
1,184
Likes
935
Location
Netherlands
I don't get what the file location has to do with a target curve.

Using Roon, I can apply PEQ to any audio source, whether from my NAS, Tidal, or other.
If you use Roon or as me foobar i can choose if i use a target curve incombination with the build in dsp if i use Tidel or any other streaming service they could broadcast their content upfront using a target curve is the assumption. So than you are forced to listen to music with a target curve as you are forced to listen to radio broadcast with compression. Than file location at least give you a choice.
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,715
Likes
38,876
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
I'll always buy a hard copy of things I really like. What happens when the internet is down?

Me too Sal. One thing you can be 100% certain of at some stage is data loss or inability to access data. It's a fact of life with digital storage, be it non volatile ram, spinning discs, SSDs, whatever.

A physical optical disc trumps all that. A most you can lose/damage a few, not your entire music library. What you lose in so-called "instant access", you gain in distributed media, known quality source, ease of replacement or disposal and the ability to never be held ransom to companies jacking up streaming prices, which they will definitely do, once the physical CD is no more in the marketplace. Your listening rights are in perpetuity and the collection can be willed/sold on forever. You are also way more likely to listen to more than just one track - you'll likely explore the whole album.
 

Snarfie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
1,184
Likes
935
Location
Netherlands
I have seen no evidence that Tidal etc do this.
Ok that is a good thing for now. But they could if they want. I don''t want to be depended if they do.
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Ok that is a good thing for now. But they could if they want. I don''t want to be depended if they do.

There are a lot of reasons to want to have local FLACs on a NAS (i.e. no DRM, works if internet is down, to have music that doesn't exist on streaming), but fear of target EQ is quite the red herring and highly unlikely.

After all, it would cost them extra money to do so, for dubious profitable upside.
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Me too Sal. One thing you can be 100% certain of at some stage is data loss or inability to access data. It's a fact of life with digital storage, be it non volatile ram, spinning discs, SSDs, whatever.

I thought everyone with a sizable FLAC collection used a RAID with redundant back ups.

At least I do....
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,715
Likes
38,876
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
I thought everyone with a sizable FLAC collection used a RAID with redundant back ups.

At least I do....

One nearby lightning strike and it's all gone on a NAS, RAID or not.

It's one of the reasons I stay physical media and dedicated players.

When you've had routers actually blown apart with pieces everywhere from a nearby strike, you'd be less likely to pursue a big NAS on 24/7. I don't use my Synology 5 bay NAS anymore as it was too noisy in any case with three internal fans. Just use a small single bay and back it up to another unplugged unit every six months or so. If it gets taken out, I can just fire up the backup NAS.

We get heaps of storms, wild electrical storms, especially in summer. Out home is on a ridge, high up and all the power around here is above ground, so strikes/surges are common. I lose a router every year or two, along with heaps of LED lightbulbs and random other stuff. That's why all my main gear, (laboratory, HiFi and AV, and network hardware) all have double pole relay isolation switches and it all gets shut off if the storms roll in over the border ranges.
 

Chrispy

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
7,938
Likes
6,097
Location
PNW
I thought everyone with a sizable FLAC collection used a RAID with redundant back ups.

At least I do....

I use two hdd backups for my collection and all of it on various thumb drives as well. No fancy NAS/RAID stuff, I just use a laptop generally.
 

Snarfie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
1,184
Likes
935
Location
Netherlands
There are a lot of reasons to want to have local FLACs on a NAS (i.e. no DRM, works if internet is down, to have music that doesn't exist on streaming), but fear of target EQ is quite the red herring and highly unlikely.

After all, it would cost them extra money to do so, for dubious profitable upside.
IMO streaming services are not targeting high-end users they are targeting mainstream listeners so a Nice laidback sound could be what is important for mainstream listeners an known from research that for instance b&k or Harman curves are than appropriate to use.
 
Last edited:

Wombat

Master Contributor
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
6,722
Likes
6,464
Location
Australia
One nearby lightning strike and it's all gone on a NAS, RAID or not.

It's one of the reasons I stay physical media and dedicated players.

When you've had routers actually blown apart with pieces everywhere from a nearby strike, you'd be less likely to pursue a big NAS on 24/7. I don't use my Synology 5 bay NAS anymore as it was too noisy in any case with three internal fans. Just use a small single bay and back it up to another unplugged unit every six months or so. If it gets taken out, I can just fire up the backup NAS.

We get heaps of storms, wild electrical storms, especially in summer. Out home is on a ridge, high up and all the power around here is above ground, so strikes/surges are common. I lose a router every year or two, along with heaps of LED lightbulbs and random other stuff. That's why all my main gear, (laboratory, HiFi and AV, and network hardware) all have double pole relay isolation switches and it all gets shut off if the storms roll in over the border ranges.

I now understand the avatar. I couldn't believe it was due to benchwork. o_O

Digital spinner, here, too. :)
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
One nearby lightning strike and it's all gone on a NAS, RAID or not.

No, it's not.

I have redundant backups of the NAS in both the cloud and a monthly archive in the fire safe.

If my house burns down (which would destroy CDs, too), the copy in the fire safe might survive, but even if not, I have the copy in the cloud

If the copy in the cloud dies, I have the copy in the fire safe.

I have to have my house burn down *and* have the cloud have data failure to lose it all.
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
IMO streaming services are not targeting high-end users they are targeting mainstream listeners so a Nice laidback sound could be what is important for mainstream listeners an known from research that for instance b&k or Harman curves are than appropriate to use.

What is the EQ curve for "nice laidback sound" that applies equally to listening on a mobile phone, laptop speakers, headphones, an Amazon Echo dot, through a TV, and other "not high end" platforms?

And do all listeners want a laid back sound, anyway?

You're inventing a scenario that doesn't exist, none of the streamers are doing, and is technically hard to pull off in a way that isn't ham-fisted.
 

Snarfie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
1,184
Likes
935
Location
Netherlands
What is the EQ curve for "nice laidback sound" that applies equally to listening on a mobile phone, laptop speakers, headphones, an Amazon Echo dot, through a TV, and other "not high end" platforms?

And do all listeners want a laid back sound, anyway?

You're inventing a scenario that doesn't exist, none of the streamers are doing, and is technically hard to pull off in a way that isn't ham-fisted.

With Laid back sound i meant "the target frequency response that average listeners would like best" enclosed more info about the Harman Curve with negative an positive findings.


https://www.soundstagesolo.com/index.php/features/217-where-are-we-at-with-the-harman-curve

I'm not for or against a target curve but i want to be in charge when i use them as I do now with my DSP. Point is if i don't have my own music files/library I'm left too streaming services who eventual could decide how I have to listen (possible target curves) what i have to pay for their services etc etc nothing more or less.

I'm not inventing a scenario I'm cautious. We have till today still the compression/loudness war going on between radio broadcast stations with the aim to get the most attention:facepalm:. We really don't know what streaming services are up to to maximize their profits. I really don't wanna be part of that.
 
Last edited:
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
With Laid back sound i meant "the target frequency response that average listeners would like best" enclosed more info about the Harman Curve with negative an positive findings.


https://www.soundstagesolo.com/index.php/features/217-where-are-we-at-with-the-harman-curve

I'm not for or against a target curve but i want to be in charge when i use them as I do now with my DSP. Point is if i don't have my own music files/library I'm left too streaming services who eventual could decide how I have to listen (possible target curves) what i have to pay for their services etc etc nothing more or less.

I'm not inventing a scenario I'm cautious. We have till today still the compression/loudness war going on between radio broadcast stations with the aim to get the most attention:facepalm:. We really don't know what streaming services are up to to maximize their profits. I really don't wanna be part of that.


Why would I apply a headphone curve to listening from my TV?
 

Snarfie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
1,184
Likes
935
Location
Netherlands
Why would I apply a headphone curve to listening from my TV?
I really don't have a clue i thought we where discussing streaming Music services like Tidal, Spotify etc..
 

Snarfie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
1,184
Likes
935
Location
Netherlands

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,198
Likes
16,927
Location
Central Fl
Just use a small single bay and back it up to another unplugged unit every six months or so. If it gets taken out, I can just fire up the backup NAS.
I've got right at 6 TB of onboard storage now, about 65% full with loads of multich flac, DSD, and a few video files. I've also got a 12 TB backup off-board disc. I keep it unplugged both from the PC's USB3 line and the AC power line. About once a month I plug it in and run a few rsync commands to update the backup storage.

If my house burns down (which would destroy CDs, too), the copy in the fire safe might survive, but even if not, I have the copy in the cloud
I love the idea of a cloud solution but the thought of trying to upload all that data on a dang 12mbps max upload line scares me off. Maybe someday when I can get a good optical feed here it will be a viable solution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom