Interesting? What does interesting have to do with anything? Where was a proof point with controlled listening test to demonstrate the truth there?If you had opened the link you would have seen that it wasn't a review, but a very interesting article about the two different technologies
Where is the proof point of that? And what is that "might" statement about? He does or does not know that is the case?
There is no there there. That kind of write-up might impress folks in an audiophile forum where people understand much less than he does.
In this site, we go by what we can prove, not what we believe. Measurements are repeatable and provable facts. Speculation like above is neither.
I mean did you really read statements like this and thought it was interesting?
Remove what noise? Dither? Author is welcome to capture audio in 24 bit format without dither and tell us it sounds unacceptable. Even in 16 bit it will be very hard for him to hear effect of dither let alone become unacceptable.
Sure, if you are dealing with 8 bit audio, you absolutely need dither. But then he claims dither doesn't work because the brain doesn't average noise to hear its benefit. Which case is he trying to make?