If anyone is looking for some great retro decoration a, um, “friend” might have one for sale. Free delivery in Toronto...unless you are just buying it for decoration
If anyone is looking for some great retro decoration a, um, “friend” might have one for sale. Free delivery in Toronto...unless you are just buying it for decoration
Come on Erin.... You don't think I know this? I did try to move the reference axis but it makes no difference post measurements. NFS optimizes the locations it measures based on reference axis you set *prior to measurements*. In this case, it has undersampled the true reference axis at higher frequencies and you cannot fix that in computational phase. Indeed it complains about reaching sampling error limit. You can shift the reported/reference axis but not accuracy of data.That said, this is easy to fix: you can adjust the reference axis and reference point in post and re-run the field identification and CEA-2034 modules to provide the data based on the tweeter axis. Which means you won't have to re-run the measurements. Just click the checkbox for "Edit Parameters" and then adjust as needed. I've had to do this a couple times so I'm speaking from unfortunate experience.
Aux is an input, not output. There is no way to measure the DAC, the amp or anything else. Wish there was as that is what I thought I would do instead of measuring it as a speaker.Maybe would be interesting to see also basic "DAC" measurement - this device has USB in and AUX ...
Come on Erin.... You don't think I know this? I did try to move the reference axis but it makes no difference post measurements. NFS optimizes the locations it measures based on reference axis you set *prior to measurements*. In this case, it has undersampled the true reference axis at higher frequencies and you cannot fix that in computational phase. Indeed it complains about reaching sampling error limit. You can shift the reported/reference axis but not accuracy of data.
If you could set the reference point to anything you wanted, why would NFS ask you to set it prior to measuring? It wouldn't, right?
Now if you have very high number of measurement points and adjustment is small and error is not huge as is the case here, you can compensate as I have done a number of times. But it simply does not work here.
B&O has a nice range. Sonos is probably the standard bearer right now. The Homepod was until Apple discontinued it and Info not think the Homepod Mini is an acceptable substitute.
yes, the best way to listen to this is:
put it on, volume level ammm about 50%,
go out from the room and close the door behind you.
I have not. We keep talking about them but I have not zoomed in on what to buy and test.
Well it isn't really mono. At least faux stereo and at best faux surround.Fun thing to test. A few seconds after reading it, I realised that the price was for one only, and that really hurt. I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir, but it's the ultimate irony that the people who bought quite expensive HiFi decades ago are now intentionally regressing to mono.
Should come as no surprise. It has PWK right on the front there. Panther Was Killed!The Panther Protection Squad now have you on their database.
.........
As soon as I clicked on 'What's New' and saw the K word, I knew a panther had died
Righto. Designed in Indianapolis and made in China.So where is it made, which country?
....Or is it "Designed in USA - Made in PRC"?
Has anybody agreed to send an an Apple HomePod yet?I am working on that....
They don’t actually make it anymore. They’ve discontinued the Homepod and are selling off old stock until it runs out.Apple still makes the HomePod