people do all day every day around here.
Yeah that's fair enough, he's perfectly allowed to ask! I have no issue with it, so long as it's not too persistent; there are many good reasons why we can't oblige.
I'm kinda done with this thread though I think, as I don't have much more to contribute.
Maybe I should just describe the outline of a system *I* would implent if an SPL cap were the goal, since "85" hasn't worked out so well, haha:
I personally don't think applying limits purely in terms of dBfs at the mix is the solution. That's only like saying the SPL limit needs to be 16 bit. It means nothing in the real world and dBfs is a poor measurement of loudness to begin with.
It would need regulation in the mix AND the cinemas.
IMHO it would need to be done in loudness terms (LUFS or similar) to achieve some sort of standardisation of maximum levels on the recording while avoiding a loudness wars situation where limiters are over used, which takes so much life out of everything.
Then, since in decades of film sound no one's been able to *actually* standardise replay level, at the replay end of the chain there should be a cap measured in dBC (or dBwhatever) for the cinema.
Thus, we would deliver mixes with a repeatable maximum loudness on the track, and cinemas could set a replay level for their room according to decibel limits. Crucially, it would be quite repeatable film to film, so they wouldn't need to test every title.
There would, however, still probably need to be some margin for error (either upward or downward from spec) as every seat in the house is different, and which the loudest is seat may be content dependent.
There'd probably need to be fines payable by law both for production and exhibition for exceeding the limit, otherwise films, and definitely advertising, would likely not comply unilaterally.
As to what the SPL limit should be.....? Who knows. (In the future someone could find there's no 100% safe level that's enjoyable. If it turns out 60dB for 0.1seconds is damaging if you go to the cinema every day and live to be 120, what do you do then?)
But, this is all irrelevant. It's what I might do, not what's actually gonna happen.