Golden phase plugs cost money...But, at a completely different cost than LGK 2.0.
Golden phase plugs cost money...But, at a completely different cost than LGK 2.0.
He he..Golden phase plugs cost money...
What does it mean...Thx for the translation!
Have you heard those speakers? Do they thump and have slam?He he..
Speaking of potential, small broadband elements.25 pieces of tc9 in each loudspeaker. Wesayso's speakers:
View attachment 212262
Or ppataki's
(with another broadband element)
https://audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/murphys-corner-line-array-project.25983/
And I'm "kinda annoyed" that you think these comments are coming from a "place of ignorance". I've made fine furniture for many years and I simply made a subjective comment regarding their appearance. You're right they're not fiberboard but they still look like a science project IMO.Uhhh... that's what unfinished MDF looks like, guys. It's a great material for speaker enclosures and ubiquitous in the well-loved commercial designs here. You would typically seal and paint it or veneer over it.
Just kinda annoyed that you are, from a place of ignorance, insulting @Rick Sykora 's hard work and contributions to the site.
Did Amir use The correct cable lifters to test these speakers?
[View attachment 212263
Sorry, I did respect Danny first, but after a lot of BS video‘s I’am finished with GR Research.
This videotells me Danny lost it…..
He's a flake.tells me Danny lost it…..
Not them, but similar. Well built / constructed plus EQ, line speakers can be awesome.What does it mean...
Have you heard those speakers? Do they thump and have slam?
Did Amir use The correct cable lifters to test these speakers?
[View attachment 212263
Sorry, I did respect Danny first, but after a lot of BS video‘s I’am finished with GR Research.
This videotells me Danny lost it…..
But he does not even sell cable risers?!He's a flake.
And I'm "kinda annoyed" that you think these comments are coming from a "place of ignorance". I've made fine furniture for many years and I simply made a subjective comment regarding their appearance. You're right they're not fiberboard but they still look like a science project IMO.
I can assure you that this Belgian beer exerts more influence than any cable riser of any kindBut have you tried and Listened For Yourself??!! Until you have, you don't haven an opinion!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
i already expressed my opinion, you seem to be the only one with further interest. move on.Tell us more about your opinion about the appearance of raw MDF. It is riveting.
If these aren’t ‘Puppy on a roll’ they’ll sound terrible ……One for the BritsDid Amir use The correct cable lifters to test these speakers?
[View attachment 212263
Sd is measured in square centimeters Not in square millimeters. Peerless TC9FD18-08 are a Sd of 36.3 square centimeters.The specs of these Peerless are very similar to the LGK2, except maybe that Sd is a bit larger 35mm2 vs 30mm2. The linear cone excursion Xmax is also the same and limited to 2.5mm. As result, if mounted is the cabinets of the LGK, the bass response will be similar too, and the distortion also similar. I made a quick simulation with Vituix and checked that Xmax is reached at less than 2 W giving and SPL under 90db at 1m. So that it will be as easy to make these saturate as happens with the LGK.
To be honest, GR Research mentions in their specs, that though the max power of their driver is 30W, this must be reduced to 10-15W if used without HPF and subwoofer. Which I consider also optimistic...
Btw, 30W is also the max power specified for the Peerless.
Reminds me of a golden oldie, from the days of the aforementioned PartsExpress "69 cent wonders"...He he..
Speaking of potential, small broadband elements.25 pieces of tc9 in each loudspeaker. Wesayso's speakers:
View attachment 212262
Or ppataki's
(with another broadband element)
https://audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/murphys-corner-line-array-project.25983/
The late Roger Russell's IDS-25Reminds me of a golden oldie, from the days of the aforementioned PartsExpress "69 cent wonders"...
View attachment 212286
No, it's a straight formula from the Klippel data, which is as per CEA 2034 Spinorama data:Klippel measures in 3D. If you know the reflecting surface material, dimension, position you can calculate the in-room response of the speaker on a bookshelf, flush to wall, etc.
I’m not sure but I assume the in-room response that @amirm posts are of listening in an undefined “typical” listening room condition.
What does it mean...
Have you heard those speakers? Do they thump and have slam?
Missed to mentioned earlier, the line speakers I have heard have been added with subwoofers. So bass in itself, the lowest frequencies they have taken care of by subwoofers.In short, what ever you do with that 3inch, no umpff there.
Missed to mentioned earlier, the line speakers I have heard have been added with subwoofers. So bass in itself, the lowest frequencies they have taken care of by subwoofers.
Wesayso also uses subwoofers. See #1358 in this thread. More pictures of his speakers, line speakers + subwoofers. Plus some measurements on them:
View attachment 212293
Wilson Audio TuneTot Review (high-end bookshelf speaker)
That's a great Freudian slip. It provided a little comic relief in what is otherwise an overly comical thread. It is not a Freudian slip, just a language slip. I edited it. English is not my native language.audiosciencereview.com