melloncolliecat
Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2023
- Messages
- 43
- Likes
- 14
OK, thanks! Do you have any measurements of different mats and how they behave?Yes- the 'mat'.
OK, thanks! Do you have any measurements of different mats and how they behave?Yes- the 'mat'.
Not a lot. Most of the mats I've encountered don't work so measurements were pretty pointless. The ones that do work I've been able to count on one hand.OK, thanks! Do you have any measurements of different mats and how they behave?
Interesting. I haven't noticed a difference, but I don't have a lot of different mats, only a few. Are there any particular types of mats you think would perform better in a test like that?Not a lot. Most of the mats I've encountered don't work so measurements were pretty pointless. The ones that do work I've been able to count on one hand.
Its easy to measure what they do if you put a microphone near the cartridge. A good mat will be measurably lower sound pressure on the mic. Of course you can hear this by simply having the volume all the way down.
The best one we've seen is sold as a separate by Oracle. Not sure what the get for them but probably around $400.00. Its acrylic, with similar hardness to that of vinyl, which in a platter pad is really important if the pad is going to be able to absorb vibration at all frequencies without reflections.Interesting. I haven't noticed a difference, but I don't have a lot of different mats, only a few. Are there any particular types of mats you think would perform better in a test like that?
EDIT: Would you care to mention those few that you think do work?
I get the skepticism. If you've not been exposed to a good mat, its likely that you would think they have no effect because most mats (I've seen, so IMO) are so much junk.Thanks for answering! @atmasphere
Personally, I'm skeptical about the mats making such a difference, apart from isolating noise in the lower freqs. I'd love to see good measurements, though. There are a lot of acrylic mats (and/or platters) out there, for Rega and Pro-Ject TT's for instance,,I can't imagine them being that much worse than Oracle's equivalent...
Alright, interesting. Are you referring to the same Oracle mat as mentioned in this discussion (1st post on 4th page)? https://www.vinylengine.com/turntable_forum/viewtopic.php?t=94733&start=36I get the skepticism. If you've not been exposed to a good mat, its likely that you would think they have no effect because most mats (I've seen, so IMO) are so much junk.
But the method I described is an easy metric to tell if the mat is doing its job. FWIW, if I use the Technics stock mat on my SL1200G, the stylus tracking the groove is easily audible from several feet away. When I replace the mat with the Oracle (and adjust the VTA, which is easy on the Technics) it changes quite a lot. Since that difference is about the vinyl resonating, its not much of a stretch to see how that can affect how the recording sounds.
I'm very convinced that since this variable is so acute and so misunderstood that its one of the major reasons people prefer digital. But when you nail this one down, its a very different picture.
No. The mat I have from them is not sticky at all.Alright, interesting. Are you referring to the same Oracle mat as mentioned in this discussion (1st post on 4th page)? https://www.vinylengine.com/turntable_forum/viewtopic.php?t=94733&start=36
I am sorry to say, but that is a faulty stylus that need replacement.View attachment 343377
View attachment 343378
Quite A lot adjustment was required here.
Azimuth adjustment with new headshell with Azimuth adjustment…
In general, you want to adjust for deviations of the cartridge coils to match the V-shaped groove to get an even cross-talk. The stylus itself should not deviate more than +/-2°; if more you risk getting uneven tracing of the groove walls.Thomas A,
I don't doubt you but how can you tell from the pictures?
From what I can judge, ≈8° off.I see, and you are eyeballing that it's well outside the acceptable deviation?
Thanks
Yes and the seller accepted my returns...the SRA was less than 85 too.I am sorry to say, but that is a faulty stylus that need replacement.
That’s good. Would be interesting to compare with the JICO when it arrives.Yes and the seller accepted my returns...the SRA was less than 85 too.
Well according to the article on Audio p.21 (https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Audio/Archive-Audio/80s/Audio-1981-03.pdf),I have the Jico SAS it looks OK. But the VTA is high as anyone can see, 30degrees VTA not 20. SRA is still correct. See post 887