• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

EarMen Tradutto Review (DAC)

Rate this DAC:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 145 71.4%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 48 23.6%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 6 3.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 4 2.0%

  • Total voters
    203
What does a headless panther mean? Does it indicate that the product did not make it to your list?
Headless panther means a poor or below average product compared to other measured products in the same category.
 
Can you post their stock press release measurements, so we can all compare?
I don't have permission to do that. I did encourage them to post it though. So hopefully they will.
 
What does a headless panther mean? Does it indicate that the product did not make it to your list?
List? What list?

The panther ratings are my opinion of a product, evaluating everything I noted. This rating means I can't think of a reason to buy it.
 
I would say the one-dimendional SINAD-centric view showed its drawbacks.
No it didn't. Unless you are a major audiophile brand selling subjectivity, which this company is not, then the game is to excel at low distortion and noise which SINAD embodies. I don't see how you can have a very well engineered DAC but not have great SINAD to go with it.
 
You wrote
And no, nothing was at odds here. SINAD of balanced output was close enough to RCA output to place the product in the category it is [...]
to justify your measurement error does not matter at all for anything. Which of course is true for the SINAD rating and thus gave you a nice backdoor to sneak out without having to admit, let alone correct anything.
The ususal pattern...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DDF
List? What list?

The panther ratings are my opinion of a product, evaluating everything I noted. This rating means I can't think of a reason to buy it.
your list of recommended stuff.
 
Well, I've bought the Tradutto about a month ago and compared it to the Gustard X16. I don't have any means to test it like Amir does, though I did a simple A/B listening test and the Tradutto sounded a tad better to my ears, so I've kept it.
 
what's your taste target and how much better did it get to the taste?
Well, both were pretty close, if I didn't A/B them, I'm almost sure I wouldn't recognise which is which in a blind test. The Tradutto was, however, a little bit better in the mid range, Gustard lacked air or body or whatever you want to call it.
 
Just a guess, but: 4.4 vs. 4.15 Vrms output might have something to do with it.
 
...a new review...!!!...he hears the same things I did...LoL...

 
I don't want this cr** even if it were for FREE (lol).

Look at those measures... totally unforgivable.
 
I don't want this cr** even if it were for FREE (lol).

Look at those measures... totally unforgivable.
-110dB THD etc is not that bad, actually quite fine. Mind you, even if it were 20dB worse you'd be very hard pressed to tell it from any SOTA DAC.
 
Anyone knows if the Tradutto is compatible with Roon? or Volumio?

Recognize like a DAC?

Thank you
 
... and what about the EarWomen?
Inquiring minds want to know!

;) :cool::facepalm:
 
I have no doubt that it does.

Doesn't tell me much about cause and effect though.

EDIT: This post was in response to a post that was moved to her:
 
Last edited:
what is cause and affect? please elaborate Im new here as trying to understand the thinking here on this site.I just like the component in my system plain and simple I really dont need to know more than that.
 
Why buy an expensive flawed product? If it sounds better to your ear with a THD rising like a rocket past 2 KHz, it only means your standard reference is not authoritative and impeccable. You are wasting money and time listening to 4-5 orders of magnitude greater distortion, miseducating your ears and your brain.
 
Back
Top Bottom