• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Dr. Sean Olive on 35 Years of “Fast Car”

I don't know how people say it's a good recording when these recordings have one of the most processed guitar sounds in history.
It's processed in such a way that the spectrum is more revealing... so if nothing else it's "good" for testing speakers with.
 
It's processed in such a way that the spectrum is more revealing... so if nothing else it's "good" for testing speakers with.

yes, basicly they removed all the body from the instrument and we are left with strings and their harmonics. any resonances in a loudspeaker falling on those will indeed be made obvious
 
The girly sounding, wispy off-key, voice breaking cannot-actually-sing stuff drives me nuts. Some of these voices sound like pre-teens and grown men are listening to it at audio shows. Weird if you ask me.
Sarah Vaughan in her pomp, 60 or more years back would show them a thing or two. Operatic range, amazing tone, great diction. And those simply recorded LPs of the 50s and early 60s might provide an engineering lesson in ‘less is more’ !
 
With a Master's and a PhD degrees in sound recording, and had taught in UCLA's recording engineering certificate program, may be this guy knows something about recording?

olive.png
 
That song desperately needs a bridge.
 
With a Master's and a PhD degrees in sound recording, and had taught in UCLA's recording engineering certificate program, may be this guy knows something about recording?

View attachment 311506
Not questioning Dr Olive’s CV, merely saying that there was an authentic and beautiful quality in LPs recorded in that period with limited technology and more simple techniques.
 
Not questioning Dr Olive’s CV, merely saying that there was an authentic and beautiful quality in LPs recorded in that period with limited technology and more simple techniques.

That was an all digital recording. She wanted/insisted that her guitar and vocal be played “live” - at the same time, not isolated.

You couldn’t go DI for the guitar back then because of the limitations so Smith had to innovate to isolate the guitar microphone sound from the vocal.
 
As a fan of Tracey Chapman music before I became familiar with Harman testing, I found it pleasant that it was in the track list. That said, there is a negative emotion that came to me when I heard the playlist in the testing thinking "this is all older music." I guess for that reason, my own playlist for testing speakers/headphones is much more modern. And is music that I already very much liked.

I remember being impressed by your playlist, not just because it had some things I like, but also because of breadth and chronology. As many have observed here, audiophile staples are often overplayed, to the detriment of some nice tracks that don't deserve it.

Olive's commentary on the technical aspects of Fast Car as a test track is interesting for sure. Chapman has (obvious) songwriting talent and a good low-register voice, although the track is a bit old-school for me: the guitar melody goes on and on and the sonic elements are few and fairly simple (but see Olive on suitability as listening test, that sparseness helps). As for bass maxxing out small speakers and modulating the voice, I'm glad I don't have those speakers. Songs from those days are pretty light on. But I've said before if we are going for vehicular works from black female-ish singer/songwriters to listen to on repeat, I'd be choosing Kelsey Lu's Foreign Car (21 years later) instead. Or Down2ridE if we stay on the automotive theme ... nothing from them in DRDB however. I may well be clueless on listening test suitability, inevitably there's more processing.
 
The girly sounding, wispy off-key, voice breaking cannot-actually-sing stuff drives me nuts. Some of these voices sound like pre-teens and grown men are listening to it at audio shows. Weird if you ask me.
As a test of equipment I agree. But I am guilty of loving the female voice. Tift Merritt. Tift Merritt. Tift Merritt.
 
I've analysed a lot of musical tracks and "Fast Track" may be the one that shows the most extended and smooth frequency spectrum from 40Hz to 12kHz (despite a small peak near 9kHz).



View attachment 311553
I have seen a lot of folks doing this, and wondering what this tells you? Do you do it in order to add eq to your preference?
 
Yes, my gawd, yes! That's been the current trend for so many female singers these days - from indie to more popular artists - especially in their slow songs.
Apparently to get across serious emotion, these singers assume you have to sound like you are totally bereft of life energy - like you are whispering from a bathtub, on your last breaths, after slitting your wrists. It's so monotonous.

Ok I can't seem to quote @restorer-john's item from the previous page in the same reply here but both of you started me thinking "omg do I like that stuff?" (or maybe it's something different) ... examples?
 
With a Master's and a PhD degrees in sound recording, and had taught in UCLA's recording engineering certificate program, may be this guy knows something about recording?

View attachment 311506

Pfft. Academic. Never done any real work.

/s
 
Pfft. Academic. Never done any real work.

/s
What do you mean by never done any real work?

You and I work hard to make money to pay for audio gear and furnish our rooms. Dr Olive, on the other hand, got Harman to build and equip him his dream home theatre that he personally designed, called it the "reference listening room", so he can listen to Fast Car whenever he likes on company time, and have Harman pay him doing it. That's some accomplishment very few can brag about.

On top of that, he got some Revel speakers into his HT, recorded some test tones, and knocked together a bunch of so called Harman headphone curves. Now he have convinced a whole bunch of people EQ'ing their headphones to his curves, which in point of fact, he had them all listening to facsimiles of Revel speakers by Harman (or were they JBL's?) in his HT whenever they put on their headphones.

Hard to think of work more real than these.

/s
 
I had no idea this was considered a test track staple. I've never been a big fan of the song and don't own a copy, but it does have a unique place in my audio journey. Probably 20+ years ago when I was first shopping for speakers, I went to audio expos and all the audio shops I could find. At one of the shops, I was surprised to hear some live music coming from one of the rooms. I went to investigate it and it turned out to be a pair of Dali floorstanding speakers playing "Fast Car". I have never before or since literally thought that I was hearing live musicians playing when it was just a pair of speakers. I don't know if it was something about the space, the speakers, the recording...but it fooled me completely. That was a fun experience.

Gosh I need to revisit that track on my current speakers now and see if it has anything like the same effect!
 
i'm probably of the opinion that Dr. Sean and his colleagues are 'of an age'... and that age includes the late 80's and so many have a few songs they've heard a million times on a multitude of equipment over decades and so it becomes a benchmark.

I literally have not heard this song for decades and I dont have much feelings about this song except to say that the radio did play this one on loop... I can understand why its a benchmark track... its simple vocals, guitar and it doesnt seem complex. It would show up bad equipment, it would highlight good equipment... to a degree.

I just played it off youtube and I could wait another 25yrs until I do this again.
 
Back
Top Bottom