I think it processes at 48 kHz, regardless of Dirac is enabled or not.Thanks...but the thing is, if I turn off Dirac, the EX5 still shows a 48kHz sampling rate for a 96KHz recording. Shouldn't it display the true rate if DL is bypassed?
I think it processes at 48 kHz, regardless of Dirac is enabled or not.Thanks...but the thing is, if I turn off Dirac, the EX5 still shows a 48kHz sampling rate for a 96KHz recording. Shouldn't it display the true rate if DL is bypassed?
What else could it be processing? I have no xovers, filters, etc, programmed. I thought it would be straight through.I think it processes at 48 kHz, regardless of Dirac is enabled or not.
It always goes though the DSP, regardless of any active processing.What else could it be processing? I have no xovers, filters, etc, programmed. I thought it would be straight through.
It always goes though the DSP, regardless of any active processing.
If that's the case, then that really sucks!I think maybe when you activate DL license in the software everything goes to 48khz and then it works like @voodooless said
If that's the case, then that really sucks!
I find it hard to believe a full-blown Analog Devices 400MHz SharcDSP can't process digital filters (which is what DL is eventually) 96KHz and beyond for a 2-channel system.
Bullocks!
It can without the Dirac license installed. The point is, Dirac needs a certain FIR resolution, and this particular DSP chip can only manage that at 48 kHz. 96 kHz would double the needed filter taps. And since only disabling Dirac won’t release the DSP resources for it, you’ll stay at 48 kHz. Uninstall Dirac to get to the 96 kHz filter software.If that's the case, then that really sucks!
I find it hard to believe a full-blown Analog Devices 400MHz SharcDSP can't process digital filters (which is what DL is eventually) 96KHz and beyond for a 2-channel system.
Bullocks!
Doesn't that depend on the reconstruction filter in the DAC?Honestly, I wouldn’t worry about it. You won’t be able te hear the difference anyway.
A little. But we know how the filter behaves based on the flex review and it should be absolutely fine. We also know the performance of the sample rate converters in the SHARC DSP: 133 SINAD, 142 dB SNR, 125 dB stopband attenuation . That is absolutely transparent.Doesn't that depend on the reconstruction filter in the DAC?
Dirac Live RCS does not support multiple subwoofers, regardless of what license you choose:just to be on the safe side before pulling the trigger:
I have two speakers with two subwoofers.
I don't have any Dirac compatible gear and I plan to try the software standalone version.
Do I need the stereo($349 ) or the multichannel($499) license for a 2.2 setup?
Stereo+DLBC licenses will work.just to be on the safe side before pulling the trigger:
I have two speakers with two subwoofers.
I don't have any Dirac compatible gear and I plan to try the software standalone version.
Do I need the stereo($349 ) or the multichannel($499) license for a 2.2 setup?
PC? Single seat setup? You can also start by doing your crossovers in EAPO and go with just the stereo license.just to be on the safe side before pulling the trigger:
I have two speakers with two subwoofers.
I don't have any Dirac compatible gear and I plan to try the software standalone version.
Do I need the stereo($349 ) or the multichannel($499) license for a 2.2 setup?
Studio Stereo or Studio Stereo + Bass Control if you have a DAC or interface with 4 outputs.just to be on the safe side before pulling the trigger:
I have two speakers with two subwoofers.
I don't have any Dirac compatible gear and I plan to try the software standalone version.
Do I need the stereo($349 ) or the multichannel($499) license for a 2.2 setup?
OK, thanks.Flavio said they had an ”intrusion” and are working on it.