OP
FiftyTifty
Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2023
- Messages
- 14
- Likes
- 3
- Thread Starter
- #21
Maybe I'm being dumb but I'm still not understanding? Outside of perhaps sinad the reviews are not given scores and the highest sinad measured is 123? If it is this you are referring to I can assure you it's not a big difference.
No worries. I'm just saying that the SU-1 is coming out as the king of bang for buck by far (at least, without balanced).
Yeah I'm coming round to the balanced thing. I don't have a receiver, but a pair of Yamaha speakers.C-100 is a star performer... it *SHOULD* be identical to the well reviewed SU-1 but with a few additional niceties.
If you cant live with the few minor operational issues it has like no vol. knob, not great BT then its a no brainer.
edit. I thought you had a yamaha receiever
for the above actives since it has XLR the M300se is the obvious choice... now its $120 usd but really i wouldnt spend less given you are using your dac to cover up operational issues with actives
i certainly would not use a plain fixed output dac if it were me... BUT some people can manage that
Not bad at all. Hmm....SMSL C100 for £79.20 (using voucher), with next day delivery:
With the price of balanced dacs, I'm wondering. What if I bought two SMSL SU-1's , set the first for my Yamaha speakers & the second for my Edirols, and changed their volume nobs to get equal volume?
Basically faking balanced by cheaping out and getting a seperate DAC for each pair of speakers. Or is that just nonsense because balanced DAC is something different and better?