That's IMO unfortunate if true (and I have no idea if it is).
It would be better if they helped Audyssey build the technologies and UI it needs to compete with Dirac on equal terms, rather than giving up on the software or binning it to permanent second-tier status. I like and use Dirac, but the best way for us to have better and more stable room correction systems is for them to have healthy competition.
I've used Audyssey and my take on it is - great technology limited by bad editorial choices, some of which can be undone with the iOS app but some of which (such as not insisting bass management be integrated into the correction, which RoomPerfect and ARC have done for 15+ years now) are and always have been indefensible. With the introduction of DLBC any rational observer has to conclude Audyssey is far behind. However, it's not an unbridgeable gap by any means - Audyssey has smart people and has done more than any other company to mainstream room correction. MultEQ-X does seem to be much too little too late, and saddled with poor corporate decisions regarding licensing terms to boot.
A counterpoint might be that Dirac has no answer for DynamicEQ; in my view loudness compensation is important and useful and should be on every audio product, but it's not a core feature of room correction in the way bass management is.