I had the same result. Not sure why.Should I worry that under ChannelReport distances are all set to "0"? Like your example above.
Easy enough to add to AVRI had the same result. Not sure why.
I added the distances in the .ady file in the json editor but were reset to '0' on the AVR. weird.I had the same result. Not sure why.
It does not explain why the .ady from the MultEQ app also had distances set to ‘0’.Could this be due to using a decimal comma instead of a point accidentally?
EQ does the level matching already but if you have really massively different volume leves between speakers, you can ofcourse volume match speakers first, dial in the new levels (both in the AVR and REW) and then start EQ from these levels.I still have a question from your latest calibration video: why are you not level matching the responses? It would seem rather important to me, especially during the creation of the first filter (bass region) where the boost or cuts are at 5dB…
I don't have multeq-x, never needed it but there's a lot of demand from X guys to be able upload MQX measurements to REW so they can follow my tutorials. I might come up with something on that soonWhat kind of advantage does this give over the multi-eq X PC software? (I already own it)
Is there a guide to do this using 'multi-eq x'?
I have MQX with a Denon 4700 and 3 subs, however there is only 2 outputs on the amp. MQX doesnt seam to do very well with splitting one of the signals to two subs. I want to use MSO to fix this, but really don't want to have to use a mini DSP just to run the EQ and delays.I don't have multeq-x, never needed it but there's a lot of demand from X guys to be able upload MQX measurements to REW so they can follow my tutorials. I might come up with something on that soon
I need some .mqx samples for testing...
I have MQX with a Denon 4700 and 3 subs, however there is only 2 outputs on the amp. MQX doesnt seam to do very well with splitting one of the signals to two subs. I want to use MSO to fix this, but really don't want to have to use a mini DSP just to run the EQ and delays.
Can this be fixed in MQ
I need to change the amps on 2 of the three subs (current Beringer inuke 3000 is far too noisy)You can use directional bass trick to EQ two sub outputs separately but you'll always be physically limited to 2 outputs for the 3rd sub. Do any of the subs have PEQ and/or continuous phase switch (ie not just 0/180)?
I would use just one sub out and split into 3. If you can dial in delays accurately on the subs themselves, you don't even need to EQ them separately. It's easy to tame the resulting bass response with Audyssey. When you use both outputs, there are limitations for time and trim differences between subs 1&2 and I've also seen different SPL offsets applied with dynamic EQ to each sub so ditched the second output. When you use them in directional mode, only one of the subs is active for crossover duty depending on the speaker and they only play together for the LFE channel.I need to change the amps on 2 of the three subs (current Beringer inuke 3000 is far too noisy)
Was looking at Hypex fusion (15 biquad EQ filters and delay) given SINAD of 100, but am open to suggestions.
It's the custom distances and custom levels you need to set in the ady, distance should stay 0 at all times. If you don't see them in your ady file, just randomly edit speaker detection results in the app before sending to your PC and they will all show up.I had the same result. Not sure why.
Got it. Thank youIt's the custom distances and custom levels you need to set in the ady, distance should stay 0 at all times. If you don't see them in your ady file, just randomly edit speaker detection results in the app before sending to your PC and they will all show up.