- Thread Starter
- #161
What do you learn from it?
"50K μF"?!Ok it's not the 50-80-100K μF we have used to see in the class A-AB ones but are not little either.
I just added what the caps say on them for the 1200as2,you can see the pic,they use the same writing (4700μF)."50K μF"?!
grrrrrr.....
For starters, "K" is Kelvin: you want "k" if you mean 1000.
And secondly, you actually want to use a different prefix: 50000μF is 50mF.
Alex
I don’t think anyone on this forum is saying there are audible differences outside of outlier fringe cases.Do we really believe that people can hear the difference between these op-amps? In a double-blind test... I very, very much doubt it.
It is quite a contrast between two worlds, Denon being class A/B, traditional HiFi with some „bling bling“ (Made in Japan, Jubilee ed.), 25 kg, vs. the modern concept of the Apollon…Nice Denon, that is one beasty boy. How is everything setup? The SMAL goes into the Apollon? Do you have to switch the speaker cables each time you switch between the Denon and Apollon?
No, I wouldn‘t call it cheap. At first I did not really like the design but it grew on me! Looks actually quite nice in the titan grey version. They do offer „nicer“ cases but these are not relevant for me.Agree. And completely disagree with those who said it looks cheap or not sturdy. Since I have one here, I can attest to how solid and well executed the build is. @Tom22, does yours feel cheap?
As an aside, the anodizing is done locally to Apollon per your order, the cases are not ordered that way.
Yes, it is the version in „titan grey“, I don‘t really like „all black“ nor silver with the strong contrast to the black housing…The photo posted by Tom22 shows the Apollon all in black with a simple grey or silver metalic edge around the front face. That silver/metalic edge is what I recommend NAD add to their NAD C298. I think such edge trim makes an improvement to otherwise large void appearance of the NAD C298. It gives the box dimensionality.
Better engineering companies. You have measured some in the past, and some not.What do you learn from it?
Nicely done indeed. I think I recognise this case from Alibaba. If it is the one I'm thinking of then it's made of laser cut and formed aluminium opposed to steel.
Looks like you can't go wrong with Hypex (as long as you don't put an 'proprietary audiophile' front end on it)!
View attachment 310267
They have quite a smart look. Judging by the thickness of the formed shell you'll certainly be getting your money's worth and they should have a nice weighty feel.Seems to be
BTW, ALLO is using the same enclosure on their ALLO BOSS2 DAC CS43198
View attachment 310516
Thank God is not the same case,this one looks like is about to go for a walkSeems to be
BTW, ALLO is using the same enclosure on their ALLO BOSS2 DAC CS43198
View attachment 310516
Probably didn’t like the casework or just doesn’t like class D amplification? I have voted Fine or not terrible with a DAC or two that are imo “lazy products“.I’m completely baffled by the fact that even 1 person gave this thing a poor rating. Even if you hate the looks it deserves a Fine vote. It’s a lot of clean power for the money.
Really? I have been using class D with my Thiel CS3.7 speakers for almost 10 years now, they are 2.7 ohms most of the frequency range and has 10" woofers, I can play loud bassy music all day if I want and it never gets hot. This is real world use.No, class D has issues with very low impedances and will not output the current into a low load resistance. The class D amps will go into protection mode.
Well...Cool amp. Did not find any information about the dB values of the alternatives. Even the foto on the manufacturer website didn‘t clarify that for me. Any ideas.
View attachment 310538
Power = 10 ^ (gain / 10) * voltage * voltage / resistance
I've been using a Gemincore class D for 15 years with Divatech MC 210 speakers (former professional division of Focal) whose impedance drops to 3 ohms at 300 Hz... And I love the organ... no problem. ..Really? I have been using class D with my Thiel CS3.7 speakers for almost 10 years now, they are 2.7 ohms most of the frequency range and has 10" woofers, I can play loud bassy music all day if I want and it never gets hot. This is real world use.
It is a fact that many people will believe in anything, especially things that have been repeated many times. Those who believe in such things (such as the difference between those op amps mentioned) will say things like: just because you can't hear what I can, doesn't mean there is no audible differences. They typically don't believe in double blind tests and will present their reasons if asked. I have seen enough posts on such back and forth arguments and finally got tired (or almost) of it.Do we really believe that people can hear the difference between these op-amps? In a double-blind test... I very, very much doubt it.
Specifications Gain (dB) 12,8/20,5/27,5/29Cool amp. Did not find any information about the dB values of the alternatives. Even the foto on the manufacturer website didn‘t clarify that for me. Any ideas.
View attachment 310538
Now I got it, the colon is not a separator but the decimal pointSpecifications Gain (dB) 12,8/20,5/27,5/29
Yeah, I think it's European standards, just like date/month/year vs. in the US month/date/year.Now I got it, the colon is not a separator but the decimal point