restorer-john
Grand Contributor
«What is a « fully passive design » When talking about an amplifier?
Passively cooled Amir was talking about. No fans to make noise.
«What is a « fully passive design » When talking about an amplifier?
Indeed, It’s almost scary tough, For some of us this is a great hobby to « compare « stuff. And this is the very relevance of a forum like this. Just feels a bit odd, that we’re heading into a place where the tag on the front panel don’t mean anything anymore. It makes me also wonder, did THX drop the ball with their licence based business model, versus the OEM one of Putzeys? I believe that as of today The AHB2 is the only power amp using thx IP/module, right?Out of the 12 blue amps in the SINAD ranking, 10 have Bruno Putzeys' modules in them.
I don't believe THX is a manufacturer of anything, are they? They're an engineering design and certification company. Assuming amp module net revenue would likely be a relatively small (niche/small market size) compared to their other business units' net revenue, why make such a drastic business move? They'd have to expand in ways that they might not be set up for.Indeed, It’s almost scary tough, For some of us this is a great hobby to « compare « stuff. And this is the very relevance of a forum like this. Just feels a bit odd, that we’re heading into a place where the tag on the front panel don’t mean anything anymore. It makes me also wonder, did THX drop the ball with their licence based business model, versus the OEM one of Putzeys? I believe that as of today The AHB2 is the only power amp using thx IP/module, right?
It’s not that clear cut. Is Hypex a « manufacturer »? it’s really not about selling hardware, it’s just the way they found to market their IP, nothing else. Same goes for THX, they do sell modules for headphone amps, I believe than in the case of AHB2 it’s a collaboration, not sure there is an actual thx « module » in it. eiher way, my point is if you want touse thx tech, it comes with a (huge) licence fee. but in the end it’s the same thing. they both have patents on a amp design, and they both look for a way to profit from it. they chose different business model to do so, and one appear to be more successful, but might just be in appearance.I don't believe THX is a manufacturer of anything, are they? They're an engineering design and certification company. Assuming amp module net revenue would likely be a relatively small (niche/small market size) compared to their other business units' net revenue, why make such a drastic business move? They'd have to expand in ways that they might not be set up for.
Just feels a bit odd, that we’re heading into a place where the tag on the front panel don’t mean anything anymore.
Out of the 12 blue amps in the SINAD ranking, 10 have Bruno Putzeys' modules in them.
s not that clear cut. Is Hypex a « manufacturer »? it’s really not about selling hardware, it’s just the way they found to market their IP, nothing else.
The teardown of the n28 shows stock purifi modules.It should be noted that the Purifi Amp modules in NAD's new amplifiers are manufactured by NAD under license from Purifi. So certianly not clear cut.
The teardown of the n28 shows stock purifi modules.
If you look at the tear downs, they are the standard Purifi modules, down to the same lettering on the boards.Oh, really??
That's interesting. I got it off of NAD's website, but maybe the situation has evolved since this was posted.
View attachment 88649
From here:
https://nadelectronics.com/nad-intros-c-298-power-amplifier-with-purifi-eigentakt-amplification/
It’s not that clear cut. Is Hypex a « manufacturer »? it’s really not about selling hardware, it’s just the way they found to market their IP, nothing else. Same goes for THX, they do sell modules for headphone amps, I believe than in the case of AHB2 it’s a collaboration, not sure there is an actual thx « module » in it. eiher way, my point is if you want touse thx tech, it comes with a (huge) licence fee. but in the end it’s the same thing. they both have patents on a amp design, and they both look for a way to profit from it. they chose different business model to do so, and one appear to be more successful, but might just be in appearance.
By "manufacturer" I mean engaging business activities that incur costs associated with manufacturing: sourcing, inventory, warranty, support, regulatory compliance and fees, etc. When you make and sell a tangible widget, as opposed to license intangible IP, you're almost in a different line of business. It may not be desirable for THX to take on all of that. I'm not aware of THX being an actual manufacturer of headphone amps; I suspect they merely license a reference design to Drop, Monoprice, SMSL, whom are all more well-positioned to either do the manufacturing themselves or outsource to the ODMs that they surely have.It’s not that clear cut. Is Hypex a « manufacturer »? it’s really not about selling hardware, it’s just the way they found to market their IP, nothing else. Same goes for THX, they do sell modules for headphone amps, I believe than in the case of AHB2 it’s a collaboration, not sure there is an actual thx « module » in it. eiher way, my point is if you want touse thx tech, it comes with a (huge) licence fee. but in the end it’s the same thing. they both have patents on a amp design, and they both look for a way to profit from it. they chose different business model to do so, and one appear to be more successful, but might just be in appearance.
I certainly felt that way with my NC252MP. Amp to handle any speaker I bring into the room: check. "Component matching" game: checkmate.I am personally very happy with this situation. Decision parameters are now a lot simpler and objective - power rating, # channel, case dimensions etc. ASR is fast becoming a vaccine for upgraditis.