Quite the pleasant surprise! Many Thanks!
Oh, it readily measures that. It is a 2 second test. It doesn't need the robotic system and so has been part of their standard measurements for a long time. I ran it the other day and it nicely separates each distortion product per frequency.3. There are some some important technical qualities which the Klippel system does not measure (correct me if I'm mistaken) harmonic distortion being the main one.
You can still characterize their response. Traditional measurement involves going to big field and making ground measurements (putting the microphone on the ground to most eliminate floor reflections). None of this is necessary with Klippel. I can measure them like regular speakers. The nice thing is that it can be done indoors so weather outside makes no difference.4. If you're measuring subs, output is pretty much the only important metric, besides extension. At LF I think the Klippel is overkill although I'm sure others know more about measuring subs than I do.
"We also measure the Quad ESL63 as a reference point. Being a full range diaphragm, this should have the highest levels of doppler.
The level of sidebands were lower but not greatly so. From this we made a simple conclusion. If the ESL sounds as good as it obviously does, with these levels of doppler, then it is a distortion mechanism we do not have to worry too much about!!"
My goal is to make them understandable.Wow! This a whole 'nother field of testing! Should be interesting. I hope we can understand what the tests mean?
Have to get an all new set that is lifesize to go with large speakers.One thing for sure, the panthers will be staying in shape. No more slacking off!
Have to get an all new set that is lifesize to go with large speakers.
Of course. As I type this in the frigid garage, the scanner is measuring JBL 305P MK II.Will you be testing studio monitors?