now this reallyThis was actually added in GLM4.1, they're phase linear down to 100hz now, if you accept an additional ~4ms of latency for a total of ~7-8 depending on the model. It also reduces the group delay.
now this reallyThis was actually added in GLM4.1, they're phase linear down to 100hz now, if you accept an additional ~4ms of latency for a total of ~7-8 depending on the model. It also reduces the group delay.
Maybe you could buy Waldo's 8361Anow this reallyinterestscannot tempt me! (looking at my wife)
actually even if someone offer me as a gift I can't take a 8361, I need a bigger home for that..... the max size for stereo to me is the 8341Maybe you could buy Waldo's 8361A
Ignorant comment.Where are this 100 years ? All I have readed on the subject Toole inclued has more to do with psychology than engeenering.
Even the humanities use more mathematics than the audio world
The science called hard science has never been used in audio. A mix between woodwork, engeneering and auditory tasting.
Because... in Hong Kong our whole apartment is about the size of a bathroom in Europe...Why would you need a larger room?
Keith
Sorry, don't remember (it was a long time ago and I wasn't running the experiment).Just out of curiosity was the noise mono or "stereo" (uncorrelated)? I have the feeling that loudspeakers and headphones with higher pair imbalance also tend to sound more spacious.
ok, then anyone willing to buy me some new furnituresThrow away the TV, turn the speakers around and they would make quite comfortable chairs, and your weight might add some useful mass damping.
Keith
You know the minimum distance for them is 1 meter, so it doesn't really matter how small is your houseok, then anyone willing to buy me some new furnitures
Where are this 100 years ? All I have readed on the subject Toole inclued has more to do with psychology than engeenering.
Even the humanities use more mathematics than the audio world
The science called hard science has never been used in audio. A mix between woodwork, engeneering and auditory tasting.
While I have a lot of experience with live music, I have almost none with recording. It strikes me that the 'objective function' of stereo recording for home reproduction is complicated. Most classical recordings capture or simulate a bit of the room/venue. But that gets added to the listener's reproduction room, with more or fewer reflections based on speaker directivity and room characteristics. A very wet production reproduced in a large, live room could be quite irritating.I find it very noticeable how HF dies away with distance, so the frequency balance of anything, be it my daughter's viola, another daughter's cello and my wife's piano sound much more bright close to than at a typical concert hall "best seat" and even more so up "in the gods" at the Albert Hall, for example.
A lot of the recordings I like are old, recorded simply with a pair of microphones over the conductor's head, for example. Close miked recordings need a lot of manipulation to get a convincing concert hall perspective.
Looking at GLM demo videos (I have been considering Genelecs myself) the balance chosen does seem to be a flat FR at the listening position which is way brighter than the normal downward slope usually recommended.
FWIW
Any research "could be wrong," even when replicated. JAES strikes me as reasonably academic and is peer reviewed. Absence of replication does not mean the results are not true.In no way did I intend to imply fabrication. Only that it Could be wrong because it hasn’t been replicated or really subject to strict peer scrutiny in academic journals over a period of time,
Sure, and how often do you see papers where none of the authors have any financial disclosures?Also, that motivated by commerce, no matter the honorability of the researcher, deserves even a higher level of scrutiny. This seems uncontroversial.
Well you're totally on your own there. That sounds like a pretty extremist view to me. I think in one survey, 87% of respondants use headphones to listen to music. It's a $2 billion dollar industry.also, I, really hate headphones. i am not alone in this. their spatial characteristics make them nearly unlistenable for music to me.
not really... I am currently sitting against my back wall, 8030C's put in front wall 5cm distance, and guess my listening distance from woofer... 75cmYou know the minimum distance for them is 1 meter, so it doesn't really matter how small is your house
Subwoofer + toilet combo!Because... in Hong Kong our whole apartment is about the size of a bathroom in Europe...
so take away spaces for bathroom, beds etc. if you give me a 8361A I can only use it as chairs or throw away my TV just to find a space to put them
Soo, how high is ceiling ? There must be a solutionnot really... I am currently sitting against my back wall, 8030C's put in front wall 5cm distance, and guess my listening distance from woofer... 75cm
If you're in North America, Skylan makes nice, furniture grade stands: https://www.skylanstands.com/Speaking of furniture, what would make some not to expensive nice, solid and stable stands for those in a livng room please ?
For my various Genelec speakers, I only use their dedicated K&M stands (which only come in black) but I have used other stands shown below:Speaking of furniture, what would make some not to expensive nice, solid and stable stands for those in a livng room please ?