tmtomh
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 3,010
- Likes
- 8,901
My sense is that @SIY is reacting to the notion that certain types of speakers/amps etc are better suited to some genres of music than others. This is true only if all the equipment under discussion is audibly colored/nonlinear/distorted in some way. So I very much agree with SIY that hardware does not drive musical preference in this way - it's either an audiophile myth, or else it's a result of folks being invested in gear that colors the sound, which I personally have no interest in. (No offense to anyone - I just personally would never want to have to listen to different genres on different setups.)
But I do partially agree with @MattHooper and @Sgt. Ear Ache in that increased fidelity of one's setup - and I would guess in particular improved room acoustics and lower-distortion speakers with no major directivity or linearity errors - can cause one to at least temporarily seek out music with sparser arrangements, close-miking, solo acoustic instruments, and so on. All my Led Zeppelin sounds better with my current system than with earlier, inferior incarnations. But if you ask me what really took my breath away as my system improved, the first thing I'm going to think of is not the crunchy, distorted electric guitar on Bring It on Home, or the improved impact of the bass and drum attack at the beginning of Good Times Bad Times - it's going to be the double-tracked, isolated acoustic guitar at the beginning of That's the Way.
To be clear, I detest the entire culture of "audiophile music" and I am guessing most or even all of the folks who've posted in this thread so far agree with me on that. But while my musical taste has not changed or expanded because my hardware has improved, I cannot rule out the possibility that within the array of music I like regardless of what hardware I listen to, I am proportionately listening to less dense/heavy stuff and more sparse/"clean" stuff because it sounds so gorgeous to me on my system.
Of course, I don't know if this is the case - no one can ever know what they would be listening to these days in an alternate universe where they never changed their equipment. I'm just saying I suspect it might be the case.
But I do partially agree with @MattHooper and @Sgt. Ear Ache in that increased fidelity of one's setup - and I would guess in particular improved room acoustics and lower-distortion speakers with no major directivity or linearity errors - can cause one to at least temporarily seek out music with sparser arrangements, close-miking, solo acoustic instruments, and so on. All my Led Zeppelin sounds better with my current system than with earlier, inferior incarnations. But if you ask me what really took my breath away as my system improved, the first thing I'm going to think of is not the crunchy, distorted electric guitar on Bring It on Home, or the improved impact of the bass and drum attack at the beginning of Good Times Bad Times - it's going to be the double-tracked, isolated acoustic guitar at the beginning of That's the Way.
To be clear, I detest the entire culture of "audiophile music" and I am guessing most or even all of the folks who've posted in this thread so far agree with me on that. But while my musical taste has not changed or expanded because my hardware has improved, I cannot rule out the possibility that within the array of music I like regardless of what hardware I listen to, I am proportionately listening to less dense/heavy stuff and more sparse/"clean" stuff because it sounds so gorgeous to me on my system.
Of course, I don't know if this is the case - no one can ever know what they would be listening to these days in an alternate universe where they never changed their equipment. I'm just saying I suspect it might be the case.
Last edited: