In that case, I think this calls for a rescan or simply taking the data down. It doesn’t seem right to publish data when it is admittedly incorrect. Even if it is of benefit to the speaker. Your detractors eat this kind of stuff up. The last thing I’d want to give them is more fuel. Keep in mind, I’m “on your side”. Just providing some perspective from the other side.
That's is why I do what I do, and my detractors do what they do!
You can't loose sight of what you are doing and blindly generate a bunch of graphs and data when it doesn't matter. This is a clock radio replacement. It is put in any and all placements including very often in bookshelves and such. The spin data is not made to predict or quantify the effects of such a device. Heck, in stereo it has a mono woofer and dual tweeters comb filtering with each other. Spin data is not predicting that.
The entire performance of this box was summed in the on-axis response when I made the distortion measurement which I made front and center in my review:
You see the U-shaped on-axis response and that is all you needed here. I almost did not run the NFS realizing that would be the net outcome and it was. On-axis response by far the first filter to apply to performance of a loudspeaker. If a device fails that, directivity is not going to save it. And for sure not what this box produces on that front.
Still, for kicks and grins, I ran an NFS scan which showed proper response to 8 kHz and above it correlated excellently with the above graph so you could visually fix it up. No way, no how I am tying up a $100,0000 system again to test this speaker to arrive at exactly the same conclusion we already have. No one would care about the new data other than those "detractors" who could go and buy their own sample and measure. My job is done and have been spending my time with NFS measuring something else.
So please, please don't make your priorities mine. We are different people with different goals here. I want to gather enough data to net out what a product is about and we are there.