I cannot represent their differential correctly in measurements.
You sure you can't?
The last round of discussion was IMHO inconclusive, partly because there were other confounding factors.
One pair of new headphones, a set of various pads, stock and after market with clear differences in construction or mechanical properties. I really don't believe that the setup you have has such large variability as to not be able to usefully characterise gross variability in pads if they exist. IMHO there are some gross variabilities, and a lot of inconsequential ones. The porosity of the inner side of the pads is likely to be the dominant question, and that will control the absorption of energy by the pads. This will probably influence both a general slope of the response and more importantly may damp the nature of at least one resonant peak or trough. As I wrote earlier, the Delkoni graphs do show a familial correlation of responses with porosity. I don't think that can be dismissed as measurement error alone.
OTOH, the whining here about the pads is almost certainly inconsequential. If there was no obvious difference between the pads provided there is unlikely to be any meaningful response variation attributable to different pads. There is no way any pad design can fix the major flaws apparent here, and moaning about invalidating the measurements is way over the top.