• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why a new dedicated SACD player has more noticeable sound quality difference than HDMI-I2S with new external DACs?

Roland68, what are good sources to buy HDMI to I2S converter ?
I bought a simple board for my own wiring. Only HDMI input and a pin header with I2S and SPDIF output, nothing more.
HDMI Extracts Digital Audio Signal I2S
You will then need a cheap board with I2S input and I2S over LVDS (HDMI) output and a clean 5 volt supply. The wiring between the two boards should be as short as possible, under 10cm.
 
Just in case this helps: my digital set up is a Sony UBP X-8OO M2 UHD BD player, that also plays SACD's and DVD-A's, the external box shown Here, that takes HDMI audio from HDMI audio port (labeled HDMI 2) from the Sony player, and outputs DSD as I²S and also as DoP.
The Sony UBP X-8OO M2 doesn't supply enough current to get the HDMI to I²S box, so at first I used an 15 Euros power supply.
The sound was so so.
I then changed the inexpensive power supply to a better quality LINEAR POWER SUPPLY.
Since then sound changed for the better, the SMSL D 400 PRO DAC I own sounds like a charm since the introduction of the Linear power supply.
 
As pointed out above - there is no point asking such questions unless the tests are properly controlled (Accurately level matched using a multimeter - an SPL meter is not accurate enough - and blind - ideally double blind, but at least with no communication (verbal or non verbal) between the participants about what they are hearing.

Otherwise there is no way of knowing if the differences perceived are really in the sound or are being created in the listeners auditory system as a result of perceptive biases - or just insufficiently matched levels. These things can create very real sounding perceived "night and day" differences that simply don't exist in the sound waves reaching the listeners ears. You say "we know what we heard", but without proper controls, you literally do not.

Important note - I am not saying there were no audible differences (though the overwhelmingly most likely case (if the masters are the same) is that there are not), but I am saying that without either controlled listening, or measurements it is not possible to know.

Asking "is it jitter or something else" is moot unless there is valid confirmation that "it" exists at all.
 
Last edited:
Over the weekend, we brought together our gears and run experiment with HDMI-I2S on a few external DACs to hear the comparison among:
  1. Oppo 105 SACD Player XLR output
  2. Oppo 105 HDMI-I2S to S.M.S.L. D400EX - XLR Output
  3. Oppo 105 HDMI-I2S to Denafrips Venus II 12th - XLR Output
  4. Oppo 105 HDMI-I2S to PS Audio DirectStream DAC Mk1 - XLR Output
  5. Technics SL-G700 SACD Player XLR output
Pre-Amp: Denafrips Athena
Amplifier: Two Mark Levinson 333 Bi-Amp
Speakers: A Pair of B&W N801
Room: Acoustically treated
Playback is level match with pink noise track so both SACD Disc and DSF file playback are the same volume SPL.
We took note so the pre-amp volume setting are different for each playback

Observations:
Slight sound characteristic differences among 2/3/4 (HDMI output)
#1 the sound is distinctly different
#5 the sound is distinctly different

Why we notice more audible difference between 1) and 5) , and very slight among 2/3/4?
Does the un-clocked HDMI-I2S interface introduce more jitter such that a dedicated SACD player will have better jitter control on its clocked SACD disc read signal?
Hi,

Could it be time- related?, aka, how much time passed between listening to one setup, moving to the next one.
If it was more than lets say, 10-20 seconds between, are you sure you really heard a real difference?, our memory usually isn't that great.
 
1 - 2 is instant switch less than 2s
3 - 4 -5 need to swap so take up to a minute
 
Back
Top Bottom