Keith_W
Major Contributor
Personally I care mainly about taste, but usually authentic methods are authentic for good reasons, the main one being taste. There are some adopted recipes that have been improved/altered to local tastes that are fine or sometimes better than the original IMO.
Hmm, there are some that are better, but most that I can think of are worse: Tex-Mex is worse than Mexican, so is American pizza, pasta, and Chinese food. I have never tried an Indian restaurant in the USA, but in the UK Indian food is almost a national cuisine (Chicken Tikka Masala is said to be the no. 1 takeaway food in the UK, beating fish and chips). For a start, Chicken Tikka Masala is a UK invention and the rest of UK Indian cuisine lacks the spiciness and zinginess of real Indian food (disclaimer, I have never been to India, but I have eaten the cooking of my Indian friends, and they have taken me to what they consider to be authentic Indian restaurants in Australia). In every case, whenever a foreign cuisine is imported into a Western country, it is toned down and made more bland.
What about Western cuisines imported into Asian countries? Like Malaysia's Ramly burger (a burger patty wrapped in an omelette and filled with chilli sauce), Japanese cheesecakes, egg tarts (an adaptation of the Portuguese egg tart), Vietnamese Banh Mi (Vietnamese reinterpretation of French baguettes), Korean army stew? In those cases I would say that there is so much local content in it that it has become a different product and they don't even try to pay homage to the original Western version by giving it the same name. The exceptions are: pizza found in Asian countries which are just as horrible as what you might find in Australia or some parts of the USA. The exception would be NY style pizza which is a different product to Italian pizza - as long as you get it out of your head and try to forget the expectation of eating an Italian pizza, it is delicious in its own right.
I think you have to consider that Jamie Oliver, Gordon Ramsey et al are aiming their recipes at Western audiences who are probably slightly above average at cooking, at best.
I imagine that the (East) Asian community in Britain is not too happy about Uncle Roger. They are loathe to share recipes, as their takeaway restaurants do very well, so most of them are probably happy to see these diluted/inauthentic recipes proliferate - it means more customers when they want the proper stuff!
Jamie Oliver is a talentless hack. He mangles everything he touches and makes no effort at authenticity. His target audience are people whose idea of foreign cuisine is what they are served in whatever depressing restaurant found in whatever depressing suburb they live in. I have respect for Gordon Ramsay, I have been to a few of his restaurants and the guy can really cook (or at least, direct his chefs on how to cook). And about half of his videos are quite authentic.
As a member of that East Asian community myself, and even from the same country as Uncle Roger (and I can do a pretty good Uncle Roger impersonation given that I can speak like that if I want to), I am really pleased that Uncle Roger is starting this conversation. I would love it if all those inauthentic restaurants were to disappear, and you have a situation like you find in countries with real cuisines such as Japan, Mexico, Italy, Greece, Nigeria, Turkey, France, China, and all the South-East Asian countries (except Singapore) - where restaurants compete on who can produce the most authentic cuisine which respects tradition and where there is no place for bastardized versions except for tourists.