Topping D90SE Review (Balanced DAC)

[Trell]

The D1se on ES9038PRO is cheaper than the D90SE and has no problems .Because there is a built-in DPPL controller and SMSL knows that users need it.

As I wrote: Part of why RME is more expensive and that does not exclude other manufactures getting it right, but is still an expense that has to be covered one way or another. My comment was about Topping having issues, though, but the same trade-offs are there with respects to costs of the product vs features for all manufactures.

 

[elvisizer]

I've never owned a Samsung or LG TV and never will.

weird flex but ok

 

[Rover]

As I wrote: Part of why RME is more expensive and that does not exclude other manufactures getting it right, but is still an expense that has to be covered one way or another. My comment was about Topping having issues, though, but the same trade-offs are there with respects to costs of the product vs features for all manufactures.

Recall that the RME ADI-2 FS is made in Germany and the D90SE is ordinary China.That's why it's more expensive.
And for the D90SE , it was too high a price , too expensive ,without the function needed by the consumer.!It is better to take a dac from SMSL or Gustard where there are no problems with ES9038PRO.
There's a built-in DPPL jitter function.!
And 100% compatible with any technique.

 

[Trell]

Recall that the RME ADI-2 FS is made in Germany and the D90SE is ordinary China.That's why it's more expensive.
And for the D90SE , it was too high a price , too expensive !It is better to take a dac from SMSL or Gustard where there are no problems with ES9038PRO.
There's a built-in DPPL jitter function.!
And 100% compatible with any technique.

Sure, a product made in Germany has added labour costs, among others, but for me the RME ADI-2 DAC fs is still the better value for it’s features and support: dynamic loudness, B/T tone control, PEQ, auto ref level, safety features like slow ramp up of volume, usable device GUI, Digicheck app. None which the other DAC/hpamp has, yet.

In this I think that RME made the right choice instead of exclusively chasing SINAD.

Useful features is what sets RME apart from the competition, and the rest has to play catch-up.

 

[Rover]

Sure, a product made in Germany has added labour costs, among others, but for me the RME ADI-2 DAC fs is still the better value for it’s features and support: dynamic loudness, B/T tone control, PEQ, auto ref level, safety features like slow ramp up of volume, usable device GUI, Digicheck app. None which the other DAC/hpamp has, yet.

In this I think that RME made the right choice instead of exclusively chasing SINAD.

Useful features is what sets RME apart from the competition, and the rest has to play catch-up.

Yes, there is truth in this.

 

[Trell]

Yes, there is truth in this.

I’ve no doubt that other manufacturers will follow with similar features as RME, but it will be a major upgrade along with costs of development. The price for the consumer will increase significantly, though.

For Topping that already has very good products it means that it’s end of the line for just better specs, and as company they need to add features to their DACs, and probably expand to other product segments as well. It’s my understanding that new product lines are in development.

 

[bennetng]

Archimago's D90SE review, part 2. Pay attention to the DSD test results:

MEASUREMENTS / REVIEW: Topping D90SE DAC - Part II: Resolution

A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.

archimago.blogspot.com

 

[Powell2199]

I've been wondering сan i use 5V mode with Neumann KH120 monitors? Maybe someone has experience on that matter?

 

[Trell]

I've been wondering сan i use 5V mode with Neumann KH120 monitors? Maybe someone has experience on that matter?

Sure you can, according to the specs: Max input level is +24 dBu (about 12V RMS) and then adjust the input Input gain control (sensitivity) on the monitors as needed for your listening levels.

KH 120 A G EU

KH 120 A G - - Nearfield Monitor,Up to 4 m (12 ft),Down to 52 Hz,Down to 57 Hz,Computer Desktop,Editing Suite,Domestic Environment,Home Studio,Broadcast,Professional Recording Studio,Up to 3 m (9 ft) - Sennheiser Discover True Sound

en-de.neumann.com

Handy calculator: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-db-volt.htm

 

[G-rig]

Hi all, this Topping unit seems good, it is over twice the price as the SMSL SU-9 (in AUS), is it twice as good or just works properly as intended?
I have just set up the SMSL SU-9 yesterday, and waiting from a reply from Shenzhang Audio to see if it's had the 3rd harmonic distortion problem (I joined to ask some questions here).

I'm also planning on running either DAC as a DAC only setup to active monitors, similar to above I'm not sure if there is a proper way to set the gain control on the rear of the speakers vs the DAC volume? I notice some hiss if standing close to the tweeters but probably get that anyway.
I still want to have a good range of volume using the phone/app as control (for now cast to CCA until I build a RPi4 and perhaps Volumio for direct streaming). I don't think the preamp ON mode is viable given lack of range and risk of very high volume (not a desktop setup with amp).

HS80M Input Sensitivity/Impedance = -10 dBu/ 10 k-ohms
Using XLR balanced outputs.

Thanks in advance!

 

[Rover]

Hi all, this Topping unit seems good, it is over twice the price as the SMSL SU-9 (in AUS), is it twice as good or just works properly as intended?
I have just set up the SMSL SU-9 yesterday, and waiting from a reply from Shenzhang Audio to see if it's had the 3rd harmonic distortion problem (I joined to ask some questions here).

I'm also planning on running either DAC as a DAC only setup to active monitors, similar to above I'm not sure if there is a proper way to set the gain control on the rear of the speakers vs the DAC volume? I notice some hiss if standing close to the tweeters but probably get that anyway.
I still want to have a good range of volume using the phone/app as control (for now cast to CCA until I build a RPi4 and perhaps Volumio for direct streaming). I don't think the preamp ON mode is viable given lack of range and risk of very high volume (not a desktop setup with amp).

HS80M Input Sensitivity/Impedance = -10 dBu/ 10 k-ohms
Using XLR balanced outputs.

Thanks in advance!

Look better at SMSL D1se.

 

[G-rig]

Look better at SMSL D1se.

Thanks, I'm looking at a few reviews. Not sure if it's worth the extra over su-9 but possibly if it works properly. No LDAC. I won't use all the time but good for convince or guests and was impressed that it kept the audio quality in tact.

A store sells this and the topping D90se locally (more expensive than Shenzheng audio, but easier than sending back to China is there are issues), I've heard the D90SE has a DSD problem.

The su-9 had a small pop when powered on/off or Changing input with my monitors setup, PC no problem (but drivers didn't work at all and crackling sound)

 

[G-rig]

The power supply and regulation and filtering stages on the D1SE look promising. I was also considering the Gustard x16.

I want to have volume control so use variable not fixed to active monitors. I think the sound is still ok. If use fixed (level 99) it can be way too loud by mistake, and the phone vol control very low.

 

[bennetng]

I've heard the D90SE has a DSD problem.

If you are referring to the Archimago review I posted above, it is not a D90SE specific issue. It is the inherent limitation of the ESS chips. Firstly, read his two previous analyses with another Topping and RME product using the AK4493:

MEASUREMENTS: DSD Testing with SoX-DSD Signals Part II (RME ADI-2 Pro FS R Black Edition, DSD Direct, Filter @ 50/150kHz) [Updated with 44.1kHz PCM --> DSD.]

A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.

archimago.blogspot.com

MEASUREMENTS: A look at DSD and using SoX-DSD as a standard for test signal conversion. The 1/10-decade Multitone 32 test. And retro-pop remixes... ;-)

A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.

archimago.blogspot.com

Then read the D90SE review:

MEASUREMENTS / REVIEW: Topping D90SE DAC - Part II: Resolution

A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.

archimago.blogspot.com

His Oppo UDP-205 with the same ESS9038 Pro chip showed the same issue as well.

MEASUREMENTS: Oppo UDP-205 DSD Playback (DSD64-DSD512), and PCM 768kHz. Plus CES2019 coverage thoughts...

A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.

archimago.blogspot.com

...as well as the Topping D10B with a non-pro ES9038

MEASUREMENTS / REVIEW: Topping D10 Balanced (D10B) DAC. Simple, no-nonsense USB DAC, excellent balanced sound quality.

A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.

archimago.blogspot.com

The conclusion is that AK4493 showed far superior DSD performance than ES9038, regardless of using "Direct DSD" or not. On the contrary, ES9038 always degrade DSD input, and the degradation is more severe with higher DSD rates (256 and 512).

It makes me curious about the CS43198 DSD performance as it claims "Direct DSD" capability as well.

 

[G-rig]

Thanks for that, correct I was just referring to the above so wasn't really pointing the finger at the D90SE per se. Good to know, no doubt the AK4493 is a great chip. My mate's got the RME AD-2 DAC and it's an awesome piece of kit. In reality I'm probably never going to use direct in with massive DSD rates, and not even sure if you'd hear a difference (blind folded of course). Forgot to mention I want something with MQA decoding for use with Tidal and own FLAC collection. The SMSL D1SE is looking good, and those Topping units are a good standard that's really all you need (D90, D70SE).

Cheers

 

[Matias]

I want something with MQA decoding

Please don't support this scam called MQA.

 

[G-rig]

Yeah I know a lot of audiophiles hate it, especially one's who's devices aren't supported. I agree it seems like a moneymaker and bit sure it's good to tamper with recordings but to me it does sound a bit better than CD. If it wasn't for Tidal it wouldn't really be a thing but using that given it can be had a lot cheaper than other streamers. Also testing a trial of Qobuz, and while it sounds fantastic the library is a lot smaller and may take years to become mainstream. If you don't have an MQA decoder I assume tidal falls back to 44.1khz, which is still fine on good equipment (and my FLAC collection is CD quality).

I'm just saying if I'm spending many hundreds on a DAC I'm not going to by one that doesn't do MQA decoding, whether it is around for a while or not.

It's a bit like LDAC, not essential but thought it sounded pretty good, shame the smsl D1se doesn't have it, hmm. Don't think it matters but good for convenience and visitors etc.

 

[Rottmannash]

I assume tidal falls back to 44.1khz....

Not sure that's true. I believe it's been proven the file is degraded vs a .flac file played through a non-MQA DAC but I could be totally mistaken.

 

[G-rig]

Yes, I haven't connected directly to a non-mqa DAC yet (and my chromecast audio does up to 96kHz but doesn't support MQA)
My point was I'm not sure that the DAC would display more than 44.1kHz in a non-MQA device would it? MQA being Tidal's hi-res format I've found is typically 88,000 kHz or so.

 

[Nettuno]

Yeah I know a lot of audiophiles hate it, especially one's who's devices aren't supported. I agree it seems like a moneymaker and bit sure it's good to tamper with recordings but to me it does sound a bit better than CD. If it wasn't for Tidal it wouldn't really be a thing but using that given it can be had a lot cheaper than other streamers. Also testing a trial of Qobuz, and while it sounds fantastic the library is a lot smaller and may take years to become mainstream. If you don't have an MQA decoder I assume tidal falls back to 44.1khz, which is still fine on good equipment (and my FLAC collection is CD quality).

I'm just saying if I'm spending many hundreds on a DAC I'm not going to by one that doesn't do MQA decoding, whether it is around for a while or not.

It's a bit like LDAC, not essential but thought it sounded pretty good, shame the smsl D1se doesn't have it, hmm. Don't think it matters but good for convenience and visitors etc.

Are you aware that Tidal compresses FLAC, WAV, AIFF and CD, LP sources with obvious data loss and serves them on a silver platter called MQA?
It is not a question of hating MQA files, but disappointment to see people fooled by so much publicity!