• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SMSL RAW Pro-DAC1 Balanced DAC Review

Rate this DAC:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 8 4.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 53 26.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 139 68.8%

  • Total voters
    202
I still own the Topping D50, I thought It wasn't worthwhile selling It but better keep It as a back Up DAC.
Using "the" Chinese HDMI audio extractor I fed both PCM and DSD to both DACs, the D50 via S/PDIF (DSD as DoP) and the DO400 PRO vía I2S, playing the same music material connected to the same integrated amp and speakers. I don't need to tell you which one I prefered.
Moreso, I got Amazon to exchange the DO300 for the DO300 EX and as I had a time frame of two weeks to return the DO300, I had both connected at the same time and playing the same music, Guess which one I prefered.

Come back when you can reliably (at least 9/10 times) pass a properly controlled level matched blind comparison, and there might be something to talk about.
 
What are the differences between the RAW Pro DAC-1 ans the SMSL SU-X? Has anyone compared the sound?
 
What are the differences between the RAW Pro DAC-1 ans the SMSL SU-X? Has anyone compared the sound?
The RAW Pro-DAC-1 uses an ES9039MS PRO, and the SU-X has two ES9039MS PRO DAC chips.
The RAW Pro-DAC-1 uses switching power supplies, while the SU-X uses transformers. In the past, I wouldn't have owned audio devices with SMPS; today, I'm very skeptical of such devices with transformers.

The RAW Pro-DAC1 has a high-quality housing and is likely identical to the usual suspects: the SMSL DO400, DL400, Loxjie D40 Pro, and D60. The devices differ in their housings and displays, and, unlike the RAW Pro-DAC1, they have a very good, high-quality, true balanced headphone amplifier with 4.4 watts.
In Amir's test, the Loxjie D40 Pro had a SINAD 0.1 lower than the RAW Pro-DAC1, i.e., 123.3 versus 123.2. This is more due to device variation or measurement inaccuracy than to any real difference.
The Loxjie D40 Pro is currently available at Amazon.de for €319.99. The money saved would probably be much better spent on headphones or speakers, as you won't find any difference in sound compared to the RAW Pro-DAC-1 or SU-X.

We conducted a very complex blind comparison with several people, including the SU-10, SU-X, DO400 (identical to the Loxjie D40 Pro), and so on, and there were virtually no differences in sound or anything attributable to one device. Especially not better or worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
What are the differences between the RAW Pro DAC-1 ans the SMSL SU-X? Has anyone compared the sound?
They are both audbly perfect : Any errors are below the level of the human ear to detect.

They will both sound the same.

Decide based on price and features. Don't worry about the sound.
 
Back
Top Bottom