@11:30 in the video. It has around a 15 degree above/below window.Where’s vertical directivity?
They look better, deeper/more bass, should sound a little "fuller" due to not having the lower midrange dip.So would anyone mind telling me what advantage my Lintons have over these? No Amp required, cost only 25% of a Linton….
I am currently working on reverse engineering my dump of the factory EEPROM into a new Sigma Studio project with all of the factory corrections intact, clear labelling of blocks and a ready to use PEQ block for room correction or other purposes. When it is complete, I will be creating a GitHub repository for it.I just read @Weeb Labs' comment on Erin's review:
View attachment 333608
Now that's crazy.
Here's a monitor that's competitive based on its acoustic performance alone, and it also has DSP capabilities allowing enthusiasts to apply room correction (and more!) in hardware.
Awesome. You can also send the correction back to Thomann so the factory can adopt it in the new batches of the speaker.I am currently working on reverse engineering my dump of the factory EEPROM into a new Sigma Studio project with all of the factory corrections intact, clear labelling of blocks and a ready to use PEQ block for room correction or other purposes. When it is complete, I will be creating a GitHub repository for it.
As explained in my comments on Erin's review, it is fairly straightforward to make adjustments. All that is needed is a TinySine USBi and a copy of the free Sigma Studio application. If you're feeling fancy, an ESP32 can be used instead and enables adjustments to be made wirelessly.
>A client can be:If you're feeling fancy, an ESP32 can be used instead and enables adjustments to be made wirelessly.
Not the 305p. They hiss like crazy and sound bassy and bright to me.I’m very interested in these. I’m also considering the JBL 305/306mk2’s and Kali LP6’s. What would you recommend?
They are also much prettier, which is not something to ignore.They look better, deeper/more bass, should sound a little "fuller" due to not having the lower midrange dip.
Intermodulation distortion?
Reliability
I am currently working on reverse engineering my dump of the factory EEPROM into a new Sigma Studio project with all of the factory corrections intact, clear labelling of blocks and a ready to use PEQ block for room correction or other purposes. When it is complete, I will be creating a GitHub repository for it.
As explained in my comments on Erin's review, it is fairly straightforward to make adjustments. All that is needed is a TinySine USBi and a copy of the free Sigma Studio application. If you're feeling fancy, an ESP32 can be used instead and enables adjustments to be made wirelessly.
Do you think this would be possible with the Swissonic X8? I remember that you were talking to the developer of these speakers in another thread and he mentioned he uses the same chip in all of them right?
FR and directivity:
They look better, deeper/more bass, should sound a little "fuller" due to not having the lower midrange dip.
Intermodulation distortion?
Reliability
I'm wondering if that low-mid dip would go away if placed on a desk, or changing dip switches on the back into other settings..?
Also interesting that slight dip at 1.3k mentioned in the video, but if i look at the graph at 11:28 (/or the image), we can notice that 1.3k is bleeding backwards quite strongly, but only that narrow 1.3k frequency if we look it from sideway, almost feels like that 1.3k envelopes the speaker.
View attachment 334154
But it is not shown if viewing it from the top:
View attachment 334157
i think it's fine for 2-way speaker, remember it is also on vertical axis and it's narrow, horizontal is great, it's more important, if this is big deal, coaxial is the way to go thenwe can notice that 1.3k is bleeding backwards quite strongly, but only that narrow 1.3k frequency if we look it from sideway, almost feels like that 1.3k envelopes the speaker.