dallasjustice
Major Contributor
Big League!Harman wins at making speakers. In fact, they win so much speaker-wise that they get tired of winning. And it's not only me saying that, lots of people are saying the same thing.
Big League!Harman wins at making speakers. In fact, they win so much speaker-wise that they get tired of winning. And it's not only me saying that, lots of people are saying the same thing.
Big League
Does it decode MQA?
Is there any reason to spend big money on any DAC whatever it will be used for? Big money isn't required for big time DAC performance.
EDIT: Dynamix beat me to it by a few seconds.
The JBL 708P loox like the speaker you've requested JBL make for you.
I bet it sounds better than the kii audio speakers.
I'd say the question is, is there any point in spending big money on a dac, period?
I could write a book on the troubles we've stirred up over there.You guys are never going to make friends at Computer Audiophile with that kind of h8ter attitude.
It's worth noting that Clayton Shaw, the original creative force behind Emerald Physics (with which he is no longer associated, I think), has a new company known as Spatial Audio and has some newer, very well received designs; some at very attractive prices: http://www.spatialaudio.us/about/Anyone had the opportunity to listen to the Emerald Physics line of speakers?
I find something like the EP 4.8 to check many of the boxes for things I've found important in speaker designs.
http://www.emeraldphysics.com/products/ep-48
Thanks for that, welcome to the forumIt's worth noting that Clayton Shaw, the original creative force behind Emerald Physics (with which he is no longer associated, I think), has a new company known as Spatial Audio and has some newer, very well received designs; some at very attractive prices: http://www.spatialaudio.us/about/
I think Clayton is one of the industry's 'white hats'.
It's worth noting that Clayton Shaw, the original creative force behind Emerald Physics (with which he is no longer associated, I think), has a new company known as Spatial Audio and has some newer, very well received designs; some at very attractive prices: http://www.spatialaudio.us/about/
I think Clayton is one of the industry's 'white hats'.
What a interesting and original (AFAIK) idea on his dipolar tweeter design in the X1! And MADE IN USA!It's worth noting that Clayton Shaw, the original creative force behind Emerald Physics (with which he is no longer associated, I think), has a new company known as Spatial Audio and has some newer, very well received designs; some at very attractive prices: http://www.spatialaudio.us/about/
I think Clayton is one of the industry's 'white hats'.
It's worth noting that Clayton Shaw, the original creative force behind Emerald Physics (with which he is no longer associated, I think), has a new company known as Spatial Audio and has some newer, very well received designs; some at very attractive prices: http://www.spatialaudio.us/about/
I think Clayton is one of the industry's 'white hats'.
The 708P is much bigger than the 705P, but only goes 4 Hz deeper...but 7 dB louder.
Any idea if Clayton has or would be interested in developing the software to run the M series speakers active with a miniDSP box as he does for the X1?It is worth noting that the mid/upper frequency drivers of all but the X1 are coaxial with proper compression drivers, not domes, and fire through the pole pieces of the 12 and 15" drivers, using the cones as horns, like Tannoys.
I don't, sorry. I don't actually follow Clayton's activities much these days; I have other priorities at the moment.Any idea if Clayton has or would be interested in developing the software to run the M series speakers active with a miniDSP box as he does for the X1?
If only I had the room for large speakers.I did stumble upon a pair of Emerald Research CS2.3s (two 15" woofers and a coaxial 12", MSRP $5000) for $1500
I bought a pair of the Emerald Physics CS2.7's used a while back. I really love them. I am a fan of open types of speakers, Magnepans, and others. So this open baffle design really works for me.Anyone had the opportunity to listen to the Emerald Physics line of speakers?
I find something like the EP 4.8 to check many of the boxes for things I've found important in speaker designs.
http://www.emeraldphysics.com/products/ep-48