SMSL DO300 DAC Review

[nerdemoji]

9039 chip or the hardware that's implementing it?

Anyway smsl internal engineering is pretty awesome for the price

The chip itself, but again it’s transparent.

 

[AnalogSteph]

I think the good folks at SMSL have their Minimum Fast and Minimum Slow filters reversed or something.

The new DL200 is an even greater mess:

FL3 definitely is Apodizing (FL7 or FL4 could be the actual Linear phase fast), FL6 can never be a fast rolloff filter yet again.

 

[Hernandezt]

You simply need to adjust the volume to 0.0 dB before before setting the Pre Mode to 'Fixed' and it will remain at 0.0 dB.
I own a DO300 and really appreciate the pre mode setting since I do not use volume controls on my DACs. For those who would like to set the volume at another level, the volume level is maintained at the level you have it set to when you set pre mode to fixed. It does not revert to +2.0 dB.

Using RCA, fixed mode, is better set 0.0 dB or +2.0 dB?

 

[iscorpio71]

As always great information and references. I've been tempted for a long time to get into a one solution headphone DAC/AMP an very close to getting Toppings DX7 Pro way back in 2019, but hold on because just did not prefer their Sabre DAC. I just recently purchased an SMSL DO300EX almost on pre-order without reviews, aldought careful of overhyped/marketing with these products. Went this route only on experience from previous listening AKM DAPs and following Chifi, forums, and it just look and had what I need. Almost certain, fingers crossed, that it will hopefully be my endgame! Course now waiting on for the reviews

 

[Doodski]

As always great information and references. I've been tempted for a long time to get into a one solution headphone DAC/AMP an very close to getting Toppings DX7 Pro way back in 2019, but hold on because just did not prefer their Sabre DAC. I just recently purchased an SMSL DO300EX almost on pre-order without reviews, aldought careful of overhyped/marketing with these products. Went this route only on experience from previous listening AKM DAPs and following Chifi, forums, and it just look and had what I need. Almost certain, fingers crossed, that it will hopefully be my endgame! Course now waiting on for the reviews

The difference between DACs to the human ear are so minimal that most DACs sound the same once a quality design is implemented. Good DACs start at less than $100. You've been here long enough to be aware that the term Chi-Fi is not allowed due to racist derogatory users of the term.

 

[iscorpio71]

The difference between DACs to the human ear are so minimal that most DACs sound the same once a quality design is implemented. Good DACs start at less than $100. You've been here long enough to be aware that the term Chi-Fi is not allowed due to racist derogatory users of the term.

I've been here a while, but had no idea that the term is derogatory, please explain. Because In fact I would argue the opposite, to me it praises Chinese ingenuity and innovation.-

 

[Doodski]

I've been here a while, but had no idea that the term is derogatory, please explain. Because In fact I would argue the opposite, to me it praises Chinese ingenuity and innovation.-

I'm not explaining more than already stated. It's a rule, not a democracy up for debate.

 

[iscorpio71]

I'm not explaining more than already stated. It's a rule, not a democracy up for debate.

You don't need to, your statement already does.

 

[nerdemoji]

yeah the problem with the term is that it has different connotations when used by different people in different sections of the audio community. Due to basically all IEM companies being Chinese and that they have positively had an effect on the industry there, almost everyone uses the term positively. However, some snobby people like to use the term in other audio communities as derogatory or as correlated with "low-quality". Therefore, the only way to prevent the usage in this way here regardless of use and context is to ban it outright.

 

[iscorpio71]

yeah the problem with the term is that it has different connotations when used by different people in different sections of the audio community. Due to basically all IEM companies being Chinese and that they have positively had an effect on the industry there, almost everyone uses the term positively. However, some snobby people like to use the term in other audio communities as derogatory or as correlated with "low-quality". Therefore, the only way to prevent the usage in this way here regardless of use and context is to ban it outright.

Hi,

Thanks for your time and kind reply. I understand, but I don't discriminate nor "band" words that have no implicit negative definition, based on other's opinions.

Best.

 

[iscorpio71]

As always great information and references. I've been tempted for a long time to get into a one solution headphone DAC/AMP an very close to getting Toppings DX7 Pro way back in 2019, but hold on because just did not prefer their Sabre DAC. I just recently purchased an SMSL DO300EX almost on pre-order without reviews, aldought careful of overhyped/marketing with these products. Went this route only on experience from previous listening AKM DAPs and following Chifi, forums, and it just look and had what I need. Almost certain, fingers crossed, that it will hopefully be my endgame! Course now waiting on for the reviews

Received and heard the DO300EX, it does not disappoint and brings the best of the headphones/iem.

 

[geekosa]

I ordered the DO300, it was at €397 VAT included during prime days

 

[Johnny Fire]

hello. i have the DO400 and i love it so far, i pair it the Airpulse A300 speakers using XL:R and seem the i have some clipping higher than -1.0db
so i use -2.0 to be sure and sound clean and nice!
i suppose the speakers dont support 5V but on Topping D90SE i was used in the past there a setting to set the 4v and 5v by user

the quick question is: is the -2.0db the right volume to get the proper 4V or is it higher like -1.5db?
thank you in advance!

 

[trexys]

Hi, I have a good impression of ASR. I find it very edifying.
I want to ask a question, what do you think of the following comment about the DO300?

Another gripe of mine is the playback of DSD files. Basically – if you listen to many DSD files, skip the DO300 altogether. The replay gain is too high, reducing dynamic range and robbing the DSD files of their nuances during playback. I have a few albums in DSD so overall it was not an issue but the few DSD64 and DSD128 tracks I tried with the DO300, things were not pretty.

https://www.audioreviews.org/smsl-do300-dac-review-kmmbd/

Thanks a lot,

 

[nerdemoji]

Hi, I have a good impression of ASR. I find it very edifying.
I want to ask a question, what do you think of the following comment about the DO300?


https://www.audioreviews.org/smsl-do300-dac-review-kmmbd/

Thanks a lot,

And they wrote this too:
“However, I consistently noticed some sonic characters on the DO300, even in blind testing. Basically: the DO300 has a noticeably harder hitting bass slam, and the stage is slightly cramped compared to my reference setup. Microdynamics is another area where the DO300 struggled, with subtle shifts in volume not being as apparent as they are on the LPGT.”

Seems like one of those people that just write things about audio equipment without any basis.
Edit: Their choice of horrible audio equipment on their “wall of excellence” also indicates that this isn’t the best source of info.