HighFutility
Active Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2022
- Messages
- 112
- Likes
- 117
I guess due to the mains filtering, you couldn't use these in mono mode to power a couple of diy subs.
It is a $196 amplifier!Yeah... 50Hz vs 80Hz. Fixed frequency and slope? No PEQ and delay adjustment at all? Borderline useless.
@SMSL-Mandy; @Fosi Audio : For a minimal 'best-practice' system an integrated or preamplifier/audio interface needs to have at minimum:
Bonus points: >=2 independent sub outs, custom biquads for IIR filters, custom FIR coefficient per channel. Doable with a lowly-old ADAU1701, chip is 5$ wholesale. Possible problem is making a non-buggy UX/UI, that is functional and easy to understand to the customer. Or just give up and package your product with an in-circuit-programming interface, so your customers could use SigmaStudio themselves.
- In the main speakers: highpass (custom slope, selectable frequency), delay, ~5 PEQ-s (selectable gain, frequency, Q)
- In the sub out(s): lowpass (custom slope, frequency), delay, ~7 PEQ-s. Even just 3 would be vastly superior than nothing.
- Simple tone-control knob (tilt or bass+treble), remote crollable. For the inherently variable music production situation due to the circle-of-confusion and for a rudimentary loudness-compensation.
Did I just describe a MiniDSP SHD Power? Sorry for the rant.
Thanks Amir. Appears to be 12db/octave at around 73 Hz. I think these are normally first order.I will see if I can measure it but the doc says not only is the sub out filtered, but you can also filter the mains. The other two sets of RCAs are the two stereo inputs.
I'd also like to know which device gives you a lot more for $100.Meh. Spend $100 more and get a lot more. OK for computer desktop, other than that I give it a thumbs down.
I'd also like to know which device gives you a lot more for $100.
You mean "USB is actually an output to connect a DAC"?USB is actually a DAC input.
This is a great option for someone stepping up from a soundbar and going with a 2.1 setup. Wish it has an optical input, but I guess we can work around that.
Curious, assuming folks are honest, how many were enjoying these amps prior to the review and are now considering moving on because of the review numbers ? I’d like to take a couple minutes to explain my situation.
Thanks.I quite liked mine but deep down I sort of had an inkling there were some deficiences.... I knew that going in... the digital input is one for example...
BUT I'm one of those guys who changes amps as often as I would change bedsheets (ie. often, I have a lady)
I'm wondering if there's some product variability... smsl are known for running v1.0 and v1.2 gear and different firmware.
As some owners have said here they are coming to grips with the fact that the numbers dont seem to match their subjective assessments.
To me this was always going to be a $200 amp. I'm actually looking at buying the Topping RA3 just to see how 'shit' it actually is. $240 isnt a big deal in the scheme of things.
The flip side is the Fosi V3 charted well but some guys here didnt like the sound.
Numbers wise true.Meh. Average performance for a relatively low, but not shockingly low, price.
Or you could buy from Amazon and try out. Very easy to return if not pleased. Of course the review will always be in the back of your mind and perhaps cloud any positive listening experience.I was on Amazon’s checkout page to buy this amp for replacing my old Technics when I saw that Amir just reviewed it. Honestly I don’t really know what to do right now, I’ve bought a week ago the dbr62 thanks to his review where he really liked those (and the same was for me). So I’m probably going to wait for something new to appear with high pass filter and remote control (maybe a Topping mx3s with more power) or maybe I’m going to go with the as-301