I think the hard part is finding a case, if you can find a pre-made case then it should be trivial.No soldering?
Oh man, I need to go learn how to do this, seems like something I would enjoy doing.
I think the hard part is finding a case, if you can find a pre-made case then it should be trivial.No soldering?
Oh man, I need to go learn how to do this, seems like something I would enjoy doing.
Be brave. Do it. I ran into a guy today who is afraid to hang pictures. Don’t be that guy.
Ghent is your friend.I think the hard part is finding a case, if you can find a pre-made case then it should be trivial.
It is not random. The cursor can only be placed on measurement points and it jumps from one to the other. It is harder to see here due to two graphs being close to each other.For the THD vs power plot, I do think you should seriously consider either consider increasing the resolution (more measurement points-there's not enough) or place the crosshairs on discrete measurement points with a finite value (not somewhere random along the line between two points).
It is not random. The cursor can only be placed on measurement points and it jumps from one to the other
It is the same really. That small 1 dB variation is not substantive. The 1ET400A has much less distortion though, both at 5 watts and at power. Here is the 5 watt comparison:So Hypex nc400 gets higher SINAD than this amp with comparable gains?
It is the same really. That small 1 dB variation is not substantive. The 1ET400A has much less distortion though, both at 5 watts and at power. Here is the 5 watt comparison:
View attachment 28885
And NC400 (sorry it is not averaged as much, ignore the business below the graph):
View attachment 28886
The 1ET400A that I tested also has a single shared SMPS.but if you look at this result you got when you only measured one channel of that nc400-implementation with a shared SMPS, nc400 has even lower distortion...
The 1ET400A that I tested also has a single shared SMPS.
Will run that tonight.....True.
Would be interesting if you measure only 1 channel of this 1ET400A amp turned on. If it can beat the single nc400 then.
So the Hypex nc400 amp you tested got higher SINAD than this amp with comparable gains? That was not expected. The input buffer of nc400 must really be something.
I would love to see more detailed comparisons with Hypex nc400. Is this Eigentakt really a step forward in performance?
There's a video put out on Youtube by New Record Day which shows the assembly process. A precocious chimp could successfully complete it in 20 minutes.Building the NC400 monoblock kits was very straight forward. I think anybody could do it, perhaps with a little guidance or help, but mostly it is just screwing the components into the chassis and connecting the wires.
I have the pieces, parts of a stereo NC 400, SMPS1200, Ghent case either in house or on order. I don't see anything in this review making me regret my decision. This looks like a good amp, but, at best, only slightly better if at all, than the amp I'll be putting together with all HYPEX parts.Yeah. I have the AHB2 and the Nc400-based NAD M22 v2 at the moment and am trying to decide between the two. And here is a third option. So in what way does this amp distinguish itself from the other two?
I'd love to see simple power-consumption numbers in these reviews. As you point out, efficiency helps more than just the electric bill....this amp was intended to have notably lower idle power dissipation.
Nah, that's Crown & QSC:So nc400 monoblocks might be "the shit"?
Power is everything in amplifiers...
There are exceptions. Read the 1st two posts here, and take a close look at #2's 1st photo.Problem being, no way you're going to be finding soldering stations in a new york city apartment >_<
Folks here are renown for calling technicians just to come change their lightbulbs. That's how handicapped we are in this sense.
Ghent Audio, costs $230, and worth it.I think the hard part is finding a case, if you can find a pre-made case then it should be trivial.
No soldering?