• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Post pictures of anything, with comment...couple words.

Hello Folks.

My small personal sanctuary:

IMG_6038.jpg


Cheers. :)
 
Last edited:
Tonight, as the comet dims, I used a vintage 20 mm f/2.8 AIS Nikkor lens (film camera lens) at f/4 (one of my son's very nice lenses that is here for whatever reason). Why? It is much easier to focus to "infinity" in the dark than the 35 mm DX lens I was using earlier! The latter focuses past infinity* and has no distance scale, so it was kind of tedious. I focused on Venus and hoped I didn't bump it when I used it! :facepalm:

Tonight I played with ISO sensitivity and shutter speeds. Nothing earth-shaking, but it was warmer outside tonight than the last couple of nights, so I had more fun!




FWIW, I like the darker image. :)

(EDIT: still not critically focused -- although the exposure time/earth's rotation may have been a factor, too. :facepalm: )
____________
* I will leave it to the more metaphysically-inclined to ponder the ramifications, if any -- besides making focusing "at infinity" tedious with such lenses. In seriousness, my son tells me the 'play' in infinity is to allow for the thermal properties (expansion) of the fancy glass (fluorite, or whatever) lenses(?)
 
Tonight, as the comet dims, I used a vintage 20 mm f/2.8 AIS Nikkor lens (film camera lens) at f/4 (one of my son's very nice lenses that is here for whatever reason). Why? It is much easier to focus to "infinity" in the dark than the 35 mm DX lens I was using earlier! The latter focuses past infinity* and has no distance scale, so it was kind of tedious. I focused on Venus and hoped I didn't bump it when I used it! :facepalm:

Tonight I played with ISO sensitivity and shutter speeds. Nothing earth-shaking, but it was warmer outside tonight than the last couple of nights, so I had more fun!




FWIW, I like the darker image. :)

(EDIT: still not critically focused -- although the exposure time/earth's rotation may have been a factor, too. :facepalm: )
____________
* I will leave it to the more metaphysically-inclined to ponder the ramifications, if any -- besides making focusing "at infinity" tedious with such lenses. In seriousness, my son tells me the 'play' in infinity is to allow for the thermal properties (expansion) of the fancy glass (fluorite, or whatever) lenses(?)
Yes, I prefer the darker one because it is not overexposed obviously like the other. But both are useful for their own reasons.
 
Kingfisher takes off.
DSC03728-Enhanced-NR-2.jpg
 
My Sunday evening arts and crafts project a few weeks back.

IMG_1222.jpeg
IMG_1223.jpeg
IMG_0516.jpeg
IMG_0517.jpeg
 
Capture d’écran 2024-10-22 à 16.34.38.png

"Villefranche sur Mer", South East of France, a beautiful town founded in 1292 by the Mediterranean Sea.
"Villefranche sur Mer" means Villefranche above the sea...
 
Last edited:
A bit of countryside.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0214.jpeg
    IMG_0214.jpeg
    466.3 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_0208.jpeg
    IMG_0208.jpeg
    724.9 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_0203.jpeg
    IMG_0203.jpeg
    498.1 KB · Views: 35
"Villefranche sur Mer", South East of France, a beautiful town founded in 1292 by the Mediterranean Sea.
"Villefranche sur Mer" means Villefranche above the sea...
Villefranche-sur-Mer has been the filming location for dozens of movies (James Bond: Never Say Never Again, To Catch A Thief, Ronin, The Transporter, etc.). I once drove along the entire coast of the French Riviera and was very impressed.

59 results for Villeranche-sur-Mer as filming location:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom