Depends which DAC though?The DSD or PCM file I feed to the DAC has ultrasonic content attenuated to well below -300dB. Do you think this content somehow produces images at the output?
And are you upsampling to high rates?
Depends which DAC though?The DSD or PCM file I feed to the DAC has ultrasonic content attenuated to well below -300dB. Do you think this content somehow produces images at the output?
Depends which DAC though?
And are you upsampling to high rates?
Understood, but we're talking objective here not subjective.With a decent DAC I can't tell the difference.
Understood, but we're talking objective here not subjective.
I don't think Amir can hear at 40kHz and no music there, but he still makes observations like (see below pic, after the audibility comment):
View attachment 195279
But this graph is less than .2 megahertz.Here's an actual recording I made earlier today with ADI-2 Pro in loopback. Do you see any images worth worrying about?
View attachment 195287
I see that they turned the PSRR problem into a feature, affording volume control via setting the analog supply voltage of the output stage.We have it working, was demoed built into Estelon Lynx speaker. And there are also other somewhat similar implementations working
Actually the designer is quite open and transparent about this, in the video I linked.but the question still his how good it works wrt supply-related distortion and modulation?
Correct, he actually says the measurements are not great. So he's not hiding anything there, which is nice.@Music1969 , Yes, I watched that one, too. They say they have visible harmonic distortion, mostly 2nd order but have concluded it's a non-issue audibly... which could well be.
My personal take-away from this thread and my experimenting:Great discussion overall by both sides - even though we are going in circles, lots of repetition by both sides.
Miska doing well in defence - a one man army here
The DSD ultansonic noise hump is in the 20 to 80Khz region (at least in the on topic recordings reviewed), peaking at about 50kHz. Right where the "high resolution" music is supposed to be. The problem isn't that this noise is audible (nor is it in your spike waveform above): the problem is that it is noise placed precisely where people are selling the supposed benefit of High Res DSD recordings.OK, so having DSD ultrasonic noise remainder 50 dB lower level at same frequencies is a problem, but this distortion is not?
That very good at ~22K. That what high PCM and DSD sampling are after.Here's an actual recording I made earlier today with ADI-2 Pro in loopback. Do you see any images worth worrying about?
View attachment 195287
I don't think there's any music above 30kHz?peaking at about 50kHz. Right where the "high resolution" music is supposed to be.
Well like a tree falling in the forest, is it music if musical instruments make the sound, but no one can hear it???????I don't think there's any music above 30kHz?
Do any music instruments make any sound over 30kHz? Even observable on measurement?Well like a tree falling in the forest, is it music if musical instruments make the sound, but no one can hear it???????
Hence "High res" in quotes - but that is not what is being sold.I don't think there's any music above 30kHz?
Do any music instruments make any sound over 30kHz? Even observable on measurement?
Do any music instruments make any sound over 30kHz? Even observable on measurement?
The DSD or PCM file I feed to the DAC has ultrasonic content attenuated to well below -300dB. Do you think this content somehow produces images at the output?