Also, case fatality rates should always be stratified by relevant demographics to provide any insightful information, in the case of COVID-19 you need to at least group the fatality rates by age groups.Where in heaven's name did you get the statistic that mortality is at least 45 times that of the flu? That doesn't line up with any published data I have seen. You must be relying on the now discredited Oxford model.
As for asymptomatic transmission, the waters are pretty murky now thankds to the WHO. Spreading panic doesn't help anything.
I appreciated your recent posts in this thread. I don't think that your posts have been too political.
I have noted the decline in new cases in NYC and the lack of a large spike of new cases in GA. My hypothesis is that earlier spikes were enough to put the "fear of God" into residents. If that's the case, how long will the fear last?
I don't see a problem with somebody with many years experience in pharmacology being in charge of choosing drug strategy. I do see a problem with ignorant people being given responsibility for things they are inexperienced in and frequently ill equipped to understand, ie most politicians.
You perhaps see Big pharma as a threat, I see it as part of modern medicine and the reason people live longer nowadays. All we need is independent control over price and availability. We have NICE here for that, they are often not popular both with patients and the pharmaceutical companiies when they decide a drug is too expensive for the likely benefits, but that is what they are there for.
They are mainly concentrating on Covid-19 at the moment, thankfully.
We had an anti racism demonstration in Amsterdam...I was...worried about the risk of infections...We can now conclude that that concern was unjustified as the demonstration did not lead to infections. It seems one more indication that the risk outdoors is very limited, unlike indoors.
I don't know your academic level, aptitude or education so I can't judge whether to take your view seriously.You have NICE in UK we have INSERM in France. I still believe that giving 11 vaccines to a baby is bad...
Check out my earlier post...most major metro cities had protests, and most did not show a spike in cases, except for LA. It’s also possible that there is a bit of self selection among the protestors (younger, if you are diagnosed you are probably not attending), driving down the infection rate among protesters. I don’t think we can conclude that attending the demonstrations was protective though.In Australia the reports of the US demonstrations showed mainly Minnesota, New York and the capitol, DC.
A look at the John Hopkins data shows that these places had a decline in cases.
View attachment 69972
Whereas Arizona had comparatively few demonstrations I believe, and the worst increase in cases.
So protest demonstrations look to have actually a protective outcome!
(At least as effective as Hydroxychloroquine, and the data quality is probably better than the papers either pro or contra.)
Unfortunately that's about all the positive news I can extract from the US.
@Putter, it's not that there is no interest in your posts, it's just that I (and I suspect I am not alone) am lost for words.
Many Australians are just dumbfounded by the US response, for instance the recent statement by the POTUS that he requested tests be slowed down.
I won't, of course, make a political call on that.
I will say that it seems Australia's intensive test system has been one of the major factors in our success.
Our restrictions were not particularly severe compared to many other countries.
But our death rate is almost 100 times less than the USA and we haven't had a death in more than 4 weeks.
Only 2 people left in Intensive Care Units in the whole country so the ratio should exceed 100 soon.
We still have not beaten Covid but our medical people have done a heroic job and the test teams are crucial.
Best wishes
David
Who exactly would be prosecuted?European countries (EU) share intelligence and their leaders knew very well what was happening in China and later in northern Italy, but the vast majority decided not to act until it was late. Knowing that it had exponential growth (confirmed in northern Italy) its inaction is faulty and has proven a great excess in mortality.
Any European healthcare system is liable to collapse if it is not acted upon accordingly. Some would take a few days longer than others but still collapse.
In South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, they were more aware of the great danger from the previous SARS pandemics and their leaders did not hesitate to act as soon as their intelligence services warned them.
This negligence is guilty and in many countries it is prosecutable, as in Spain, even with the opposition of the prosecution thanks to investigating judges -inheritance of the French Napoleonic code- and private accusations.
Criminal negligence is contemplated in the Spanish penal code. Some complaints even raise the crime of reckless homicide by ALL the members of the council of ministers, since the decisions are solidary. It must be shown that some of those reports reached that council. There is supposed to be a record of it, unless they are destroyed [crime again] like...
The one who surely had daily access to the National Security reports is the Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez.