Unfortunately the A300 does not have an auto standby feature. It can be operated using the remote control or the power button on the front panel.Does this amp have auto-standby? What's power consumption in standby mode and in normal mode but when nothing plays?
On the previous page I wrote how much it consumes. I took new measurements after everything was plugged in and used for a week. It consumes 2.1-2.3 watts (avg. 2.2W) with power OFF, avg. 5.1W with power ON. Foobar 0dB, DAC 99, A300 - 25 - it uses 5.2-5.5 watts.Thx! MX5 has one, but consumes about 2.5W.
The A300 does not have a DAC chip for USB-DAC.Is there any info on the USB DAC anywhere? I cant seem to find it.
Don't be disappointed.That sucks
.. and thank you
But presumably without the quality loss of the BT compression?The A300 does not have a DAC chip for USB-DAC.
The S/PDIF signal from the USB input is input to the BT module and converted to analog using the DAC function for BT built into the BT module.
So the sound quality is almost the same as BT.
The USB input is just a bonus feature.
Then you have to wait for all-in-one Loxije Ax0 with MA5332 to appear. Even Chinese manufacturers don't shoot themselves in the foot by offering a full-fledged BT in a power amplifier.But presumably without the quality loss of the BT compression?
I haven't checked all BT modules, but BT modules have an external input mode, and you can input S/PDIF signals from USB/COAX/OPT to the D/AC section via I2S to obtain analog output.But presumably without the quality loss of the BT compression?
So in this case it wont be the same sound as bluetooth, since it doesn't suffer the BT codec compression - it is just using the DAC in the BT module. So we need measurements of the USB output before we know how good (or bad) that is.I haven't checked all BT modules, but BT modules have an external input mode, and you can input S/PDIF signals from USB/COAX/OPT to the D/AC section via I2S to obtain analog output.
The format at this time is often input at 48kHz/16bit like BT. I don't think there is any compression applied to the operation in this case.
However, there are models such as the Loxjie A30 that have a dedicated DAC chip without using a BT module.
The digital input sound is BAD, it's nowhere as close as good as any of my DACs or soundcardSo in this case it wont be the same sound as bluetooth, since it doesn't suffer the BT codec compression - it is just using the DAC in the BT module. So we need measurements of the USB output before we know how good (or bad) that is.
The digital input sound is BAD, it's nowhere as close as good as any of my DACs or soundcard
Well, companies have an economic interest in lying because it often makes them money. This has been discussed before too, and we are quite many who say the same thing.to be honest I'd trust the manufacturers measurements before I trusted any inividuals sighted listening for the evaluation.
The amplifier chip used in SMSL A300 is not MA12070.A tip, the same amplifier chip as in the SMSL A300 is found in this amplifier module. If you are curious about it, here is the link:
Class D power amplifier module Merus MA12070
What do you think about this one? By the way the same amplifier chip found in: https://audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/new-smsl-a300-btl-class-d-power-amp.34607/ https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002545644886.html ___...audiosciencereview.com
... and Sabaj A10a 2022...The products using MA5332MS are A300 and SabajA20a 2022.