It does do more power into 8 ohms. Not sure why Crutchfield lists the specs like that, look at
NAD's page instead. It doesn't give a spec for 4 ohm continuous, oddly, but it shows 200W peak at 4 ohm. You're definitely not going to need more than 80W continuous regardless, the peaks are the only time you need more power.
I would say the NAD C 379 looks about perfect for what you want.
If you're still concerned about the power, I'd suggest looking at the
JBL MA7100HP as a multichannel AVR. Plenty of power, can get a Dirac license, not a giant ugly box like most AVRs.
But if I were you, I'd just pull the trigger on the NAD. Crutchfield gives you 60 days to return it, plenty of time for you to decide if it works for you and your space, as I suspect it will.
Edit: Check out the
review for the NAD C268. It has the same oddity with 80W/ch continuous rating for both 8 and 4 ohm but much higher peak power numbers. I suspect the C379 is using similar Hypex amps, if not the exact same. The review basically confirms the specs: 80W @ 8 ohm, 96W @ 4 ohm, but peak power at 4 ohm of 230W. Again, momentary peaks are where you really need the power, and the amps deliver then. Continuous power needs will likely be well under 80W for any sane listening volumes.
Edit2: Looks like you have to buy a separate module for the NAD to get BluOS which includes Dirac.
They seem to run around $400.