Today I went down to a dealer to have a listen to the NAD M10. I wasn't all to impressed with the sound. Tracks like Massive Attack's Angel and the Telarc version of the 1812 Overture sounded harsh and uncomfortable (speakers were Dynaudio 40 and Wilson Sasha DAW). The bass sounded 'fluttery', the synth drums and cannon notes just seemed jarring.
He played the same tracks (using Tidal for both) on a NAIM Uniti Atom (which is 40W/ch). I wasn't prepared to by impressed due to the lower wattage numbers, but everything just sounded better. The tracks suddenly sounded more pleasant, and the bass really hit hard. When the cannon's went off in 1812, I could feel it on my chest, which never happened with the NAD.
Another interesting thing is that with the NAD I was playing around 70-80% volume to test it, while the NAIM felt about equally loud at 55%. I am talking loud as in I had to shout to make myself heard to the dealer.
Has anybody else had an experience with these two amps side by side ? I wanted to like the NAD for all it's features and the Hypex UCD amps, but a puny 40w/ch class AB amp just sounded so much better. What explains that ?
P.S - I also had a quick listen to the NAD M33. To my it sounded a bit better than the M10, but not significantly so.
He played the same tracks (using Tidal for both) on a NAIM Uniti Atom (which is 40W/ch). I wasn't prepared to by impressed due to the lower wattage numbers, but everything just sounded better. The tracks suddenly sounded more pleasant, and the bass really hit hard. When the cannon's went off in 1812, I could feel it on my chest, which never happened with the NAD.
Another interesting thing is that with the NAD I was playing around 70-80% volume to test it, while the NAIM felt about equally loud at 55%. I am talking loud as in I had to shout to make myself heard to the dealer.
Has anybody else had an experience with these two amps side by side ? I wanted to like the NAD for all it's features and the Hypex UCD amps, but a puny 40w/ch class AB amp just sounded so much better. What explains that ?
P.S - I also had a quick listen to the NAD M33. To my it sounded a bit better than the M10, but not significantly so.
Last edited: